Back

FLEXTAG: A Small and Self-renewable Protein Labeling System for Anti-fading Multi-color Super-resolution Imaging

Zhang, H.; Yao, Y.; Wang, X.; Tao, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Feric, M.; Zhou, R.

2025-07-23 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.07.19.665678 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Super-resolution fluorescence imaging enables visualization of subcellular structures and molecular interactions at the nanoscale, but its broader application has been hindered by long-standing limitations in current protein tagging systems, including rapid photobleaching, tag-induced artifacts, poor post-fixation labeling efficiency, and restricted multiplexing capability. Here, we present FLEXTAG (Fluorescent Labeling for Exchangeable, X-resilient Tagging in Advanced Generic Nanoscopy), a comprehensive protein labeling system comprising three orthogonal, ultrasmall (12-18 kDa), and self-renewable protein tags that collectively overcome these major limitations of existing tagging systems, enabling optimized multi-color super-resolution imaging. Through continuous exchange of organic fluorophores, FLEXTAG supports unprecedented durations of high-resolution imaging in both live and fixed cells with minimal photobleaching. It is compatible with major super-resolution modalities, such as SIM, STED, STORM, and PAINT, and is applicable to a wide range of subcellular targets. To further address fixation-induced labeling inefficiency and background fluorescence, we developed a novel protection-based fixation method and chemical blocking strategies that significantly preserve tag accessibility and enhance signal-to-noise ratio, improvements that are broadly applicable to other protein tagging systems. Altogether, FLEXTAG enables long-term tracking of dynamic behaviors and interactions of subcellular targets, as well as mapping of nanoscale protein organizations and cellular architecture, advancing both basic research and translational applications in cell biology.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.