Exploring neural mechanisms underlying error-related impairments in active working memory suggests an adaptive shielding of contents during cognitive control
Choo, Y.; Adam, K. C. S.; Wessel, J. R.
Show abstract
Goal-directed behavior relies on cognitive flexibility - the ability to rapidly adapt ongoing thoughts and behaviors while preserving task-relevant information. The performance monitoring system optimizes such behavior by detecting and evaluating errors, while the working memory (WM) system maintains relevant information and protects it from interference. We investigated how these two systems interact. In prior work (Wessel et al., 2022), we found that motor errors impaired active WM maintenance (Error-Related Impairment of Active working Memory; ERIAM). Here, we aimed to identify the source of ERIAM by tracking a neurophysiological marker of visual WM maintenance - the contralateral delay activity (CDA) - throughout the error-making process. Forty-two human participants maintained visual information in WM while performing a motoric task during the delay period. Consistent with prior results, a significant ERIAM effect occurred: motor errors impaired WM performance. Critically, CDA amplitudes did not differ between motor correct and error trials before the flanker task, ruling out a general performance deficit. The CDA was also unaffected immediately after flankers, ruling out a perceptual interference explanation. Significant CDA differences only emerged after motor errors, supporting a genuinely error-related origin of the ERIAM effect. Contrary to prediction, however, CDA was more disrupted after correct responses than errors, and greater disruptions predicted a smaller ERIAM effect. These findings suggest that participants might store WM in multiple states to reduce interference from errors and that the CDA dynamics reflect these adaptive shielding strategies. These findings provide new insights into the source of error-related interference in active WM.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Confidence and insight into working memories are shaped by attention and recent performance 97%
- Neural signatures of competition between voluntary and involuntary influences over the focus of attention in visual working memory 97%
- Real-world objects scaffold visual working memory for features: Increased neural engagement when colors are remembered as part of meaningful objects 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships between individual differences in dual process and electrophysiological signatures of familiarity and recollection during retrieval 95%
- Usefulness of a familiarity signal during recognition depends on test format: Neurocognitive evidence for a core assumption of the CLS framework 95%
- Alpha/beta power decreases during episodic memory formation predict the magnitude of alpha/beta power decreases during subsequent retrieval 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.