Back

Semaphorin 3A and 3F overexpression in TIE2 hyperactive endothelial cells contribute to the pathological lumen expansion in venous malformation

Schrenk, S.; Sherpa, C.; Bischoff, L. J.; Cai, Y.; Boscolo, E.

2025-07-20 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.18.665640 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract (formatted)O_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSVenous malformation (VM) are developmental defects of the vasculature characterized by tremendously enlarged and dysfunctional veins. Gain-of-function somatic mutations in the endothelial-specific tyrosine kinase receptor TIE2 have been identified as leading driver of VM pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the aberrant venous lumen expansion is caused by recruitment of wild-type endothelial cells (EC) to the lesion or by TIE2-mutant EC clonal expansion. MethodsTo investigate the contribution of TIE2-mutant EC and wild-type EC to the aberrant venous lumen expansion, we used a xenograft murine model of VM generated with a combination of TIE2-mutant EC and wild-type EC. To perform longitudinal studies, we employed a three-dimensional (3D) fibrin gel lumen formation assay and a migration assay, both using wild-type EC in competition or confrontation with TIE2-mutant EC. To investigate the mechanisms implicated in VM lumen expansion we used RNA-sequencing and short interference (sh)RNA in the TIE2-mutant EC. ResultsWe demonstrate here that in the VM xenograft model, the aberrant blood vessels were lined almost exclusively by TIE2-mutant EC, and wild-type EC were rarely found. Functionally, the TIE2-mutant EC exerted a competitive advantage over wild-type EC by inhibiting wild-type EC sprouting. In line with these findings, TIE2-mutant EC promoted repulsion of wild-type EC. ShRNA-mediated silencing of Sema3A or Sema3F in TIE2-mutant EC rescued this chemorepellent phenotype and restored the ability of wild-type EC to migrate, sprout and form lumens. Furthermore, knock-down of Sema3A or 3F in TIE2-mutant EC normalized the blood vessel size in vivo. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that wild-type EC are not recruited to the aberrant veins suggesting VM pathogenesis is fueled by clonal expansion of TIE2-mutant EC. Mechanistically, we show that Sema3A and 3F are overexpressed in TIE2-mutant EC and play a crucial role in the pathological vascular lumen expansion in VM. Abstract (not formatted)Venous malformations (VM) are developmental defects of the vasculature characterized by tremendously enlarged and dysfunctional veins. Gain-of function somatic mutations in the endothelial-specific tyrosine kinase receptor TIE2 have been identified as one of the leading drivers of VM pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the aberrant venous lumen expansion is caused by the recruitment of wild-type endothelial cells (EC) to the lesion or instead by TIE2-mutant EC clonal expansion. In a xenograft murine model of VM generated with a combination of TIE2-mutant EC and wild-type EC, we demonstrated that the aberrant blood vessels were lined almost exclusively by TIE2-mutant EC, suggesting lesions form by clonal expansion, while wild-type EC were not recruited to the aberrant veins. Functionally, in a three-dimensional cell competition assay, we showed that TIE2-mutant EC exerted a competitive advantage over wild-type EC by inhibiting wild-type EC sprouting and ability to form vascular lumens. In line with these findings, TIE2-mutant EC repelled wild-type EC by reversing their migration direction in a cell confrontation assay. In seeking to define the mechanism driving this repulsion phenotype, we detected elevated levels of the chemorepellent Semaphorin 3A (Sema3A) and Sema3F in the TIE2-mutant EC. ShRNA-mediated silencing of Sema3A or Sema3F rescued the chemorepellent phenotype and restored the ability of wild-type EC to migrate, sprout and form lumens. Furthermore, Sema3A or 3F knock-down in TIE2-mutant EC normalized the blood vessel morphology and size in vivo. Taken together, these data strongly indicates that Sema3A and 3F are important players in VM pathogenesis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
15
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
19
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
25
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
29
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%