Back

Transcriptional Circuitry in HGSOC: A Dynamic Three-State Model Informed by a Living Biobank of Purified Tumour Fractions

Barnes, B. M.; Littler, S.; Tighe, A.; Evans, A.; Altringham, J.; Nelson, L.; Lin, I.-H.; Morgan, R. D.; McGrail, J. C.; Taylor, S. S.

2025-07-22 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.18.665513 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is a heterogeneous disease, but efforts to define transcriptional subtypes using bulk RNA sequencing have been confounded by the presence of non-malignant cells. As a result, it remains unclear whether tumour-cell-intrinsic states exist, and whether these represent stable disease subtypes or are dynamically remodelled during disease progression and treatment. Here, we address this question using a living biobank of patient-derived ovarian cancer models (OCMs) cultured as purified tumour-cell populations under uniform conditions. RNA sequencing followed by unsupervised non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) revealed a robust, hierarchical architecture comprising three core tumour-cell-intrinsic subtypes: the Alpha cluster, marked by cell-cycle deregulation and E2F-driven replication stress; the Beta cluster, defined by tumour-cell-intrinsic immune mimicry and inflammatory signalling; and the Gamma cluster, characterised by epithelial identity, extracellular matrix engagement, and metabolic adaptation. At higher clustering resolution, a fourth cluster, Delta, emerged as a Gamma sub-lineage distinguished by a vesicle-oriented, neuronal-like secretory programme. By projecting cluster labels onto a subset of matched longitudinal OCMs using non-negative least squares, we show that while some tumours retain stable subtype identities, others display transcriptional plasticity, including transitions from epithelial-like Gamma states to more proliferative or secretory phenotypes. Together, these findings define the core architecture and dynamic potential of tumour-cell-intrinsic transcriptional states within HGSOC, thereby bridging legacy bulk classifications with emerging single-cell insights, establishing a framework for more precise patient stratification.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.