Back

Two Spag6 genes control sperm formation and male fertility in mice

Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Li, T.; Zheng, C.; Niu, C.; Schmitt, A.; Yap, Y. T.; Abdulghani, M.; Yuan, S.; Melander, C.; Strauss, J. F.; Toure, A.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.

2025-07-22 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.07.18.665465 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sperm-associated antigen 6 (SPAG6) is the mammalian orthologue of Chlamydomonas PF16, a central axonemal protein essential for flagellar motility. In mice, two homologous genes have been identified: the ancestral Spag6 on chromosome 2 and the evolutionary derived Spag6l on chromosome 16. Although Spag6 knockout mice (Spag6-/-) are phenotypically normal, the surviving Spag6l-/- males are infertile. To further investigate the roles of SPAG6 and SPAG6L, we generated compound mutants by crossing the two knockout lines. Compound heterozygous Spag6+/-; Spag6l+/- mice are fertile, while all Spag6-/-; Spag6l+/- males are infertile despite grossly normal appearance. Histological and ultrastructural analyses revealed defective spermiogenesis, including abnormal chromatin condensation, malformed acrosome and manchette, and disorganized mitochondrial and fibrous sheath. Both SPAG6 and SPAG6L bind to SPINK2, a key regulator of acrosome function, but SPAG6 has an approximately 10-fold higher binding affinity than SPAG6L. Moreover, SPAG6 modulates testicular AKAP4 and SPAG16L levels, which are critical components of the fibrous sheath and central apparatus respectively. Notably, SPAG6 suppresses tubulin acetylation, whereas SPAG6L enhances this post-translational modification, suggesting antagonistic roles in microtubule assembly. Overall, our findings demonstrate that SPAG6 and SPAG6L coordinately regulate sperm formation and male fertility during evolution.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.