A non-invasive test for stria vascularis dysfunction
Ingham, N. J.; Panganiban, C. H.; McClaskey, C. M.; Harris, K. C.; Steel, K. P.
Show abstract
Age-related hearing loss is common in the human population but it is highly heterogeneous in aetiology which has hampered efforts to develop ways of stopping its progression. Three major sites of the initial dysfunction are the sensory hair cells, their innervation, and the stria vascularis which generates the high potassium endolymph maintained at a high endocochlear potential bathing the apical surface of hair cells. Treatments aimed at the initial site-of-lesion may be useful, and diagnostic tools to distinguish the primary site would help stratify clinical trials and facilitate selection of the most suitable treatment for each person. Here we report a new non-invasive test that distinguishes mutant mice with known stria vascularis dysfunction and reduced endocochlear potential from mice with sensory hair cell or neural defects but with normal endocochlear potential. It is based on measuring inter-trial coherence in auditory brainstem responses to individual stimuli. Mice with reduced strial function show good inter-trial coherence compared with the amplitude of the averaged response, while mice with sensory or neural deficits show poor coherence. This method might be useful in humans to predict whether they have reduced strial function, which cannot be measured directly, and identify who would benefit from treatments aimed at boosting strial function.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting cochlear synaptopathy in mice with varying degrees of outer hair cell dysfunction using auditory evoked potentials 95%
- Discovering age- and sex-specific genetic risk factors in sensorineural hearing loss: genome-wide evidence from large-scale biobank studies 95%
- Optimizing auditory brainstem response acquisition using interleaved frequencies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.