Weed Out the Risk: Pharmacovigilance in Medical Cannabis Users
Doucette, M. L.; Chin, J.; Fisher, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionMedical cannabis use has expanded rapidly, yet long-term real-world safety data remain limited. We evaluated adverse-event (AE) frequency, severity, and predictors in a US telehealth registry of medical cannabis patients over one year. MethodsWe analyzed 14,313 adults who completed intake between June-August 2024. Patients reported any of 30 prespecified adverse events (AEs) and rated each on a 0-10 impact scale. Weekly exposure was estimated as (days/week) x (serving size) and categorized into quintiles. We computed AE rates per 100 patients with binomial 95% confidence intervals (CI) and tested linear trends. Univariate logistic regressions assessed 20 candidate predictors within chronic-pain and anxiety subgroups. We then applied LASSO to select multivariate predictors, combining these with age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, and unhealthy-weeks in final logistic models. Marginal predicted-probability curves were generated across exposure, stratified by subgroup, sex, race, and age. ResultsOverall, 2.6% of patients reported [≥]1 AE. The most common symptoms were increased appetite (23.8%), fatigue (20.3%), and anxiety (19.9%) with mean impact <4/10. In adjusted models, having been to the doctor because of their condition remained the sole AE predictor for patients with anxiety (OR 4.03, 95% CI: 2.44-6.87); age was a significant predictor for patients with chronic pain (OR 0.981, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Marginal curves remained flat ([~]2-3% AE probability) across weekly cannabis exposure. Ad hoc analysis of non-missing-at-random data suggests possible AE rates are in line with current literature. DiscussionIn this large cohort, AEs were infrequent and mild, and weekly cannabis frequency did not independently increase odds. Healthcare engagement likely reflects underlying health complexity driving AE reporting. These findings support the safety of medical cannabis.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cannabis Use and Sleep Quality in Daily Life: a Daily Diary Study of Adults Starting Cannabis for Health Concerns 96%
- LIBR Methamphetamine and Opioid Cue Database (LIBR MOCD): Development and Validation 93%
- Fentanyl, Heroin, and Methamphetamine-Based Counterfeit Pills Sold at Tourist-Oriented Pharmacies in Mexico: An Ethnographic and Drug Checking Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of extent of cannabis use and psychotic like intoxication experiences in a multi-national sample of First Episode Psychosis patients and controls 94%
- Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and Adverse Drug Reactions Among Adults in a London Mental Health Service, 2008-2018 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A large Australian longitudinal cohort registry demonstrates sustained safety and efficacy of oral medicinal cannabis for at least two years 96%
- A Multi-Centre, Tolerability Study of a Cannabidiol-enriched Cannabis Herbal Extract for Chronic Headaches in Adolescents: the CAN-CHA Protocol 94%
- Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.