Back

Weed Out the Risk: Pharmacovigilance in Medical Cannabis Users

Doucette, M. L.; Chin, J.; Fisher, E.

2025-07-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.07.18.25331800 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMedical cannabis use has expanded rapidly, yet long-term real-world safety data remain limited. We evaluated adverse-event (AE) frequency, severity, and predictors in a US telehealth registry of medical cannabis patients over one year. MethodsWe analyzed 14,313 adults who completed intake between June-August 2024. Patients reported any of 30 prespecified adverse events (AEs) and rated each on a 0-10 impact scale. Weekly exposure was estimated as (days/week) x (serving size) and categorized into quintiles. We computed AE rates per 100 patients with binomial 95% confidence intervals (CI) and tested linear trends. Univariate logistic regressions assessed 20 candidate predictors within chronic-pain and anxiety subgroups. We then applied LASSO to select multivariate predictors, combining these with age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, and unhealthy-weeks in final logistic models. Marginal predicted-probability curves were generated across exposure, stratified by subgroup, sex, race, and age. ResultsOverall, 2.6% of patients reported [&ge;]1 AE. The most common symptoms were increased appetite (23.8%), fatigue (20.3%), and anxiety (19.9%) with mean impact <4/10. In adjusted models, having been to the doctor because of their condition remained the sole AE predictor for patients with anxiety (OR 4.03, 95% CI: 2.44-6.87); age was a significant predictor for patients with chronic pain (OR 0.981, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Marginal curves remained flat ([~]2-3% AE probability) across weekly cannabis exposure. Ad hoc analysis of non-missing-at-random data suggests possible AE rates are in line with current literature. DiscussionIn this large cohort, AEs were infrequent and mild, and weekly cannabis frequency did not independently increase odds. Healthcare engagement likely reflects underlying health complexity driving AE reporting. These findings support the safety of medical cannabis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
7
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
15
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%