Back

Changes in inter-limb coordination and kinetics due to gradually introduced locomotor adaptation in people with trans-tibial amputation

Selgrade, B. P.; Chang, Y.-H.

2025-07-21 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.07.18.25331783 medRxiv
Show abstract

People with amputation walk asymmetrically, leading to increased risk of intact leg injury. Split-belt treadmill walking using error augmentation has potential to correct this asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to assess how people with trans-tibial amputation and matched control subjects would adapt their limb forces to gradual onset split-belt treadmill walking. Consistent with prior split-belt results in sudden onset split-belt walking, we hypothesized that, after gradual onset split-belt walking, people with trans-tibial amputation and intact controls would display aftereffects in braking force but not propulsive force. We also hypothesized that both groups would have aftereffects in step length symmetry and double support, indicating predictive control of inter-leg coordination. People with trans-tibial amputation and control subjects displayed aftereffects in braking force, propulsive force, double support time, and step length symmetry. People with trans-tibial amputation displayed an aftereffect in step length opposite their baseline asymmetry. Both subject groups had aftereffects in fast (intact) leg forces that were larger for braking and smaller for propulsive forces than baseline. These findings indicate that gradual onset split-belt adaptation involves predictive control of inter-leg coordination and leg forces, which is not impaired by trans-tibial amputation. Predictive control of step length and braking is consistent with prior work, but these results suggest different adaptive control of propulsion than prior sudden onset research. This study shows that gradual onset split-belt walking may correct step length asymmetries in people with trans-tibial amputation, but increased intact leg braking aftereffects has potentially negative implications for correcting amputation-related kinetic asymmetries.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
4
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
6
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
15
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%