Disaggregating the Genetic Overlap Between Educational Attainment and Substance Use Phenotypes
Davis, C. N.; Khan, Y.; Piserchia, Z.; Gray, J. C.; Kranzler, H. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundEducational attainment (EA) is positively genetically correlated with alcohol and cannabis use, but negatively correlated with alcohol and cannabis use disorders. These opposing associations suggest that shared genetic influences differ by level of substance involvement and for the cognitive (CogEA) and non-cognitive (NonCogEA) components of EA. MethodsTo test this, we examined the shared genetic architecture of EA, CogEA, and NonCogEA with alcohol consumption (AC), alcohol use disorder (AUD), lifetime cannabis use (CanUse), and cannabis use disorder (CUD). We used bivariate causal mixture models, local genetic correlation analyses, and conditional/conjunctional false discovery rate analyses to identify polygenic, regional, and variant-level overlap. ResultsFor variants shared with AC, 48.12% and 52.86% showed concordant effects with CogEA and NonCogEA, respectively, compared to 38.40% and 41.02% for AUD. For CanUse, 71.42% and 65.56% of shared variants were concordant with CogEA and NonCogEA, respectively, versus 37.97% and 42.23% for CUD. Jointly associated loci were identified for each substance-EA pair. AUD and CogEA variants were enriched for expression in the basal ganglia, CUD and CogEA in the substantia nigra, and CanUse and NonCogEA in the cerebellum and its hemispheres. ConclusionsAlthough EA is associated with greater substance use and lower risk for disorder, this pattern reflects a complex mix of concordant and discordant variant effects. CogEA and NonCogEA show partially distinct patterns, particularly for cannabis-related traits, highlighting the importance of disaggregating EA to clarify the genetic architecture underlying its paradoxical associations with substance-related traits.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying risk factors involved in the common versus specific liabilities to substance abuse: A genetically informed approach 96%
- Neurogenetic and multi-omic sources of overlap among sensation seeking, alcohol consumption, and alcohol use disorder 96%
- A Multivariate Approach to Understanding the Genetic Overlap between Externalizing Phenotypes and Substance Use Disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in Genetic Correlations between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder-Related Phenotypes Compared to Alcohol Consumption-Related Phenotypes 96%
- Impulsivity Facets and Substance Use Involvement: Insights from Genomic Structural Equation Modeling 96%
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the genetic overlap of suicide-related behaviors and substance use disorders 94%
- Differential shared genetic influences on anxiety with problematic alcohol use compared to alcohol consumption. 94%
- Integrative multi-omics analysis of genomic, epigenomic, and metabolomics data leads to new insights for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Addiction Risk Factor: A Unitary Genetic Vulnerability Characterizes Substance Use Disorders and Their Associations with Common Correlates 95%
- Genetic overlap between mood instability and alcohol-related phenotypes suggests shared biological underpinnings 95%
- Longitudinal Neurocognitive Trajectories in a Large Cohort of Youth Who Use Cannabis: Combining Self-Report and Toxicology 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association study identifies common genetic risk factors for alcohol, heroin and methamphetamine dependence 94%
- Genome-wide association studies of lifetime and frequency cannabis use in 131,895 individuals 93%
- Educational attainment causally impacts drinking behaviors and risk for alcohol dependence: results from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study in ~ 780,000 study participants 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.