Back

Sphingomyelinase Licensing of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Alters Lipid and Protein Metabolites for Immunomodulation

DeVeaux, S. A.; Shah, D. C.; Rui, K.; Chiappa, N. F.; Zhang, H.; Lal, N.; ONeill, R.; Jang, Y. C.; Mortensen, L. J.; Roy, K.; Botchwey, E.

2025-07-22 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.07.17.665406 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are widely studied for their immunomodulatory and tissue reparative capabilities, but clinical translation has been hampered by inconsistent efficacy and limited standardization in manufacturing. While cytokine-based priming methods, such as interferon-gamma (IFN-{gamma}) stimulation, have shown promise in enhancing MSC potency, alternative approaches targeting distinct biological metabolism integral to secretome and membrane architecture have not been explored in MSCs. In this study, we investigate sphingomyelinase (SMase), an enzyme that generates ceramide from sphingomyelin, as a novel lipid-based priming strategy to modulate MSC function. Here, human MSCs were treated with SMase and high-content imaging and morphological profiling revealed that SMase-treated cells adopted a phenotype overlapping with IFN-{gamma}-licensed MSCs, including increased cell compactness and solidity. Lipidomic analysis showed broad alterations in sphingolipid species, and dynamic flux estimation (DFE) modeling predicted distinct metabolic shifts in SMase-treated cells compared to untreated controls. These changes were sustained up to 35 hours post-stimulation, indicating stable metabolic reprogramming. SMase priming also altered the MSC secretome, enriching for factors implicated in immune regulation. Functionally, SMase-primed MSCs retained the ability to suppress T-cell activation and promote anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotypes. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that SMase stimulation induces a durable, immunomodulatory-like state in MSCs through coordinated changes in lipid metabolism and secretory activity. This lipid-centric priming approach represents a promising alternative to cytokine-based licensing strategies and may support therapeutic MSC products.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
2
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.3%
3
Stem Cells
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
6
Journal of Biological Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
8
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
16
Oncogenesis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
20
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Integrative Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
25
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
27
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Bioscience Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Experimental Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%