Back

Membrane Tethering of Honeybee Antimicrobial Peptides in Drosophila Enhances Pathogen Defense at the Cost of Stress-Induced Host Vulnerability

Wei, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, X.; Kim, D.; Lee, J.; Bang, J. K.; Kim, W. J.

2025-07-19 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.07.17.665347 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a promising alternative to conventional antibiotics in combating multidrug-resistant pathogens, yet their clinical translation is hindered by proteolytic instability, cytotoxicity, and poor bioavailability. Here, we demonstrate that glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-mediated membrane tethering of honeybee defensin1 (Def1) in Drosophila melanogaster enhances its antimicrobial efficacy by [~]100-fold compared to secreted or untethered forms, while preserving physiological and behavioral integrity under baseline conditions. Using a genetically engineered Drosophila model, we expressed three Def1 variants: native (Def1), secreted (s-Def1), and membrane-tethered (t-Def1). Flies expressing t-Def1 exhibited superior bacterial clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and improved survival post-infection, with no adverse effects on locomotion, courtship, or sleep architecture. However, under stress paradigms--including sleep deprivation and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced gut injury--t-Def1 exacerbated intestinal barrier dysfunction, as evidenced by elevated Smurf phenotype incidence, highlighting a trade-off between antimicrobial potency and epithelial vulnerability. Our work establishes Drosophila as a powerful platform for dissecting AMP mechanisms and engineering spatially targeted therapies, offering translational insights for pollinator health and human infectious disease management. These results advocate for iterative refinement of membrane-anchoring strategies to balance therapeutic efficacy with host safety, advancing the development of next-generation AMPs with minimized off-target effects.

Published in ChemBioChem · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.