Learning the bistable cortical dynamics of the sleep-onset period
Hu, Z.; Aravind, M.; Lei, X.; Kutz, J. N.; Aucouturier, J.-J.
Show abstract
Humans just dont fall asleep like a log - or step-function. Rather, the sleep-onset period (SOP) exhibits dynamic and non-monotonous changes of electroencephalogram (EEG) with high, and so far poorly understood, intra- and inter-individual variability. Computational models of the sleep regulation network have suggested that the transition to sleep can be viewed as a noisy bifurcation at a saddle point which is determined by an underlying control signal or "sleep drive". However, such models do not describe how internal control signals in the SOP can produce rapid switches between stable wake and sleep states, nor how these state-space changes are translated in the macroscopic EEG. Here, we propose a minimally-parameterized stochastic dynamical model, in which one slowly-varying control parameter drives the wake-to-sleep transition while exhibiting noise-driven bistability. We provide a procedure for estimating the parameters of the model given single observations of experimental sleep EEG data, and show that it can reproduce a wide variety of SOP phenomenology. Using the model to analyze a pre-existing sleep EEG dataset, we find that the estimated model parameters correlate with subjective sleepiness reports. These results suggest that the bistable characteristics of the SOP can serve as biomarkers for tracking intra- and inter-individual variability of sleep-onset disorders. Author summaryRecent neuroscience research has showed a growing interest in understanding the complexity of how we fall asleep. Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings of the sleep onset period show all the hallmarks of a noise-driven bistable system, but there currently exists no computational model that can be fitted on experimental data to understand this behavior. In this paper, we propose a minimally-parameterized model, which dynamics corresponds to the motion of an noisy overdamped particle in a slowly tilting bistable landscape, as well as a way to fit it to an individuals sleep-onset EEG. We show that the fitted parameters of individual participants correlate with their subjective reports of sleepiness, suggesting that the model can capture important aspects of inter-individual variability, as well as provide potential biomarkers for sleep-onset disorders.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Average beta burst duration profiles provide a signature of dynamical changes between the ON and OFF medication states in Parkinson's disease 96%
- A hidden Markov model reliably characterizes ketamine-induced spectral dynamics in macaque LFP and human EEG 96%
- Switching state-space modeling of neural signal dynamics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-attractor repertoire provides new perspective on structure-function relationship in the brain 94%
- Detecting changes in dynamical structures in synchronous neural oscillations using probabilistic inference 94%
- Pumping Up your Predictive Power for Cognitive State Detection with the Proper GAINS 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling and Inference Methods for Switching Regime-Dependent Dynamical Systems with Multiscale Neural Observations 95%
- Multimodal subspace identification for modeling discrete-continuous spiking and field potential population activity 95%
- How to design optimal brain stimulation to modulate phase-amplitude coupling? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A dynamic generative model can extract interpretable oscillatory components from multichannel neurophysiological recordings 95%
- A statistical framework to assess cross-frequency coupling while accounting for modeled confounding effects 95%
- Beta oscillations and waves in motor cortex can be accounted for by the interplay of spatially-structured connectivity and fluctuating inputs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.