Back

A single-cell transcriptomic atlas maps cerebellar astrocyte diversity and uncovers the transcriptional code underlying their maturation trajectories

Cerrato, V.; Turrini, G.; Vitali, I.; Xiong, B.; Solanelles-Farre, L.; Lopes, A.; Magrinelli, E.; Bocchi, R.; Götz, M.; Fischer-Sternjak, J.; Boda, E.; Buffo, A.; Telley, L.

2025-07-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.17.665323 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Astrocytes are increasingly recognized as key regulators of neural circuit development and function, with mounting evidence revealing substantial heterogeneity within and across brain regions. Yet, the full extent of this diversity and its developmental mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this, we leveraged the uniqueness of the mouse cerebellum, which hosts well-defined astrocyte types and established progenitor pools. Through complementary multi-modal omic approaches, including single-cell RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, trajectory inference, clonal lineage reconstruction, and gene expression and regulatory network analyses, we systematically dissected the molecular diversity and ontogenesis of cerebellar astrocytes. We identified known types and uncovered new subtypes with functional specialization, inferring their developmental trajectories from multiple embryonic niches and postnatal progenitor sources with fate divergence, convergence, and restriction. We further predicted a hierarchical transcriptional regulator code governing this diversification, operating at multiple levels: distinct regulatory modules i) reflect embryonic regionalization and lineage; ii) determine broad astroglial identity; specify iii) Bergmann versus non-Bergmann fates; and guide iv) astrocyte type and v) subtype acquisition. Our findings map and temporally organize transcriptional programs that capture key determinants of astrocyte fate, integrating them along defined trajectories toward diverse astrocyte identities. This high-resolution framework for cerebellar glial diversification offers a model to be challenged across other brain regions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.