Back

Remote sensing of bird communities in the Peruvian Amazon: evaluating Landsat predictors for biodiversity monitoring.

Slater, A. C.; Kirkby, C.; Ketola, C.; Hartley, I.; Bush, A.

2025-07-21 ecology
10.1101/2025.07.17.665287 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Tropical forests harbour some of the highest biodiversity on Earth but are undergoing rapid loss and degradation. In the Amazon more than one-third of forests have been altered through human activities, with major implications for wildlife communities. While Earth observation satellites effectively monitor forest cover at scale, it remains unclear how well satellite-derived variables capture variation in bird communities. We tested whether Landsat reflectance and vegetation indices can predict bird species occurrence and community composition in the Peruvian Amazon. We analysed 3,129 point counts and mist-net bird surveys conducted over 16 years in the Tambopata Forest, south-eastern Peru. As predictors we compared the effectiveness of remote sensing derived surface reflectance and vegetation indices (e.g. NDVI and tasselled cap), with traditional land-type and forest cover descriptors. Species occurrence probabilities and community composition of 135 frequently recorded bird species were estimated using multi-species occupancy models that account for imperfect detection. Models using Landsat reflectance and vegetation indices outperformed those based on habitat categories in predicting species occupancy (mean AUC = 0.68 vs 0.58). They also achieved high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.7) for more species (49 compared with 20). However, low detection rates across surveys limited all models ability to accurately estimate full community composition and to detect change over time. Our results demonstrate that satellite-derived variables can improve predictions of bird occurrence compared with habitat categories, but their effectiveness depends strongly on survey design and species detectability. Integrating remote sensing with well-structured field surveys provides a scalable approach to monitoring biodiversity trends in tropical forests.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
4
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
6
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
9
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
30
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%