Back

Maturation of Dorsal Association Tracts during Preadolescence Links to Concurrent and Future Cognitive Performance and Transdiagnostic Psychopathology

Wang, D.; Hammond, C. J.; Salmeron, B. J.; Xiao, X.; Murray, L.; Gu, H.; Zhai, T.; Quam, A.; Hill, J.; Nguyen, H.; Lu, H.; Janes, A.; Ross, T. J.; Yang, Y.

2025-07-20 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.17.664983 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many psychiatric disorders begin during adolescence, coinciding with the rapid development of brain white matter (WM). However, it remains unclear whether deviations from normal WM maturation during this age period contribute to the development of psychopathology. In this study, we developed and validated normative models of brain age based on specific WM tracts using three large-scale developmental datasets (a total of [~]10,000 subjects). We found that tract-specific deviations in WM development of association and limbic/subcortical systems were linked to concurrent cognition and psychopathology. The spatial pattern of the association system aligned closely with distributions of high-order brain networks, and with mitochondrial content and respiratory capacity. The maturation of the association system contributed significantly to better cognitive performance assessed two or three years later. Importantly, delayed WM development especially in dorsal association tracts predicted psychiatric disorders across diagnoses and disorder onset over a 2-year follow-up. By identifying tract-specific WM development during preadolescence as a predictor of cognitive capacity and psychiatric disorder risks, this study provides a valuable framework for tracking individualized brain maturation and understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of cognitive performance and transdiagnostic psychopathology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.