Back

Airway Epithelial SARS-CoV-2 Infectious and Repair Responses: Relationships to Age, Sex, and Post-COVID Pulmonary Syndromes

Dang, H.; Edwards, C. E.; Kato, T.; Reidel, B.; Meganck, R. M.; Esther, C. R.; Ehre, C.; Fulcher, M. L.; Bailey, A. B.; Cooley, M. R.; Mikami, Y.; Asakura, T.; Hawkins, P. E.; Saito, M.; Meyers, J. L.; Konopka, K.; Gerayeli, F. V.; Park, H. Y.; Sin, D. D.; Livraghi-Butrico, A.; Okuda, K.; Pickles, R. J.; Klein, S. L.; Randell, S. H.; O'Neal, W. K.; Baric, R. S.; Boucher, R. C.

2025-07-17 cell biology
10.1101/2025.07.17.663733 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The long-term pulmonary sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infections reflect infection severity, innate and adaptive immunity, and respiratory epithelial repair. This study investigated the acute and reparative responses as a function of age and sex in primary human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cultures utilizing a 14-day SARS-CoV-2 infection protocol. SARS-CoV-2 infection peaked at 3 days post-infection (dpi) with an [~] 2 log titer suppression at 14 dpi. SARS-CoV-2 infection induced interferon, interferon-induced gene, and cell damage responses. No age- or sex-dependent effects on SARS-CoV-2 infection were detected. Airway epithelia repaired to an abnormal mucus metaplastic/inflammatory state that reflected potentially beneficial and adverse consequences at 14 dpi. Repair processes were infection severity-dependent, not sex-dependent, and were more robust in young donor cultures. Analyses of long-COVID subjects with persistent pulmonary fibrosis or persistent bronchitic airway diseases exhibited expression of HBE 14 dpi failed repair gene signatures, including ISG gene signatures. Human airway epithelial repair post-SARS-CoV-2 is prolonged and incomplete in vitro over 14 days, and persistently abnormal repair may contribute to phenotypes of people with long-COVID pulmonary syndrome.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.