Evaluating Changes in Pain Medication Administration During IUD Insertion, 2018-2025
Masters, N. B.; Gilbert, K.; Cartwright, B. M. G.; Rodriguez, P. J.; Do, D.; Stucky, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundIntrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective, long-acting reversible contraceptives that can prevent pregnancy for up to 10 years. IUDs can also provide important non-contraceptive benefits, including reducing heavy periods and cramping, and improving pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Despite their effectiveness, IUD insertion is painful, and pain management during IUD insertions is uncommon, with most patients just recommended to take NSAIDs such as ibuprofen at home prior to the procedure. The CDC updated their Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use in August 2024, including guidance on pain management during IUD insertions. ObjectivesThis study aims to describe real-world trends in the use of pain medication during IUD insertion over time, specifically evaluating lidocaine and opioid use. We also evaluate the impact of CDCs 2024 recommendations on pain medication administration during IUD insertion. Study DesignThis study used a subset of Truveta Data, a daily updated electronic health record (EHR) database from a collective of US healthcare systems. IUD insertions were included in the study population if the patient was of female biological sex and aged 15-49 years at the time of the procedure and the procedure occurred between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2025. Lidocaine and opioid medications prescribed or administered on the day of the IUD insertion were captured, and logistic interrupted time series analyses models were used to evaluate predictors associated with receipt of lidocaine or opioids and quantify the impact of the 2024 recommendations. ResultsThere were 286,144 IUD insertions meeting study criteria between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2025. IUD insertions were most common in individuals aged 25-39 (40.0%), followed by those aged 35-49 (36.7%) and those aged 15-24 years (23.2%). In 2018, 1.7% of patients received any pain medication with their IUD insertion, 1.2% received lidocaine and 0.8% received an opioid. In 2025, 5.0% of patients received any pain medication; 4.2% received lidocaine and 2.0% received an opioid. This represents a 195% increase in pain medication overall, a 253% increase in lidocaine, and a 142% increase in opioids. After adjusting for other factors in time series models, the CDC guidelines were associated with an 18% immediate increase in the odds of lidocaine receipt (aOR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.34) and a 22% immediate increase in the odds of opioid receipt during IUD insertion (aOR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.44). However, the monthly trend of pain medication administration and prescriptions for both lidocaine and opioids did not increase significantly after the guidelines. ConclusionsWhile rates of pain medication administration and prescriptions during IUD procedures have increased nearly threefold since 2018, in 2025, 95% of women receiving an IUD are still not receiving pain medication as part of the procedure.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 94%
- Clinical experiences with the use of oxytocin injection by healthcare providers in a South-Western State Nigeria: A Cross sectional study. 93%
- Assessment of awareness and attitudes of pregnant women toward labor epidural analgesia and factors influencing the decision to opt for it: A cross-sectional study. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Twitter Data for Cohort Studies of Drug Safety in Pregnancy: A Proof-of-Concept with Beta-Blockers 91%
- Identifying Women at Risk for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Using a Mobile Health Application 90%
- Identifying High Priority Ethical Challenges for Precision Emergency Medicine - A Nominal Group Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 92%
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 91%
- Facilitators and barriers to contraception access and use for Hispanic American adolescent women: An integrative literature review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 94%
- Purchase of hormonal contraceptive methods after delivery: a population-based study from Finland 94%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 94%
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.