Patient-Specific and Interpretable Deep Brain Stimulation Optimisation Using MRI and Clinical Review Data
Mikroulis, A.; Lasica, A.; Filip, P.; Bakstein, E.; Novak, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundOptimisation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) settings is a key aspect in achieving clinical efficacy in movement disorders, such as the Parkinsons disease. Modern techniques attempt to solve the problem through data-intensive statistical and machine learning approaches, adding significant overhead to the existing clinical workflows. Here, we present an optimisation approach for DBS electrode contact and current selection, grounded in routinely collected MRI data, well-established tools (Lead-DBS) and, optionally, clinical review records. MethodsThe pipeline, packaged in a cross-platform tool, uses lead reconstruction data and simulation of volume of tissue activated to estimate the contacts in optimal position relative to the target structure, and suggest optimal stimulation current. The tool then allows further interactive user optimisation of the current settings. Existing electrode contact evaluations can be optionally included in the calculation process for further fine-tuning and adverse effect avoidance. ResultsBased on a sample of 177 implanted electrode reconstructions from 89 Parkinsons disease patients, we demonstrate that DBS parameter setting by our algorithm is more effective in covering the target structure (Wilcoxon p<6e-12, Hedges g>0.34) and minimising electric field leakage to neighbouring regions (p<2e-15, g>0.84) compared to expert parameter settings. ConclusionThe proposed automated method, for optimisation of the DBS electrode contact and current selection shows promising results and is readily applicable to existing clinical workflows. We demonstrate that the algorithmically selected contacts perform better than manual selections according to electric field calculations, allowing for a comparable clinical outcome without the iterative optimisation procedure.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters for modulating neuroimaging-based targets 98%
- A retrospective evaluation of automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters 96%
- Towards adaptive deep brain stimulation: clinical and technical notes on a novel commercial device for chronic brain sensing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Deep Brain Stimulation programming based on electrode location – a randomized, cross-over trial using a data-driven algorithm 95%
- Controlling pallidal oscillations in real-time in Parkinson's disease using evoked interference deep brain stimulation (eiDBS): proof of concept in the human 95%
- Evaluation of DBS computational modeling methodologies using in-vivo electrophysiology in Parkinson's disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linking Profiles of Pathway Activation with Clinical Motor Improvements – a Retrospective Computational Study 97%
- Neuroimaging-based analysis of DBS outcome in pediatric dystonia: Insights from the GEPESTIM registry 93%
- Spatial versus angular resolution for tractography-assisted planning of deep brain stimulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Endogenous signals during active movement predict deep brain stimulation evoked potential pathways: Results of a transfer function analysis 96%
- Decoding Neural Activity in Sulcal and White Matter Areas of the Brain to Accurately Predict Individual Finger Movement and Tactile Stimuli of the Human Hand 93%
- Simulation of closed-loop deep brain stimulation control schemes for suppression of pathological beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.