Back

Shared and modality-specific brain networks underlying predictive coding of temporal sequences

Bonetti, L.; Fernandez-Rubio, G.; Rosso, M.; Carlomagno, F.; Malvaso, A.; Greco, A.; Kringelbach, M. L.; Vuust, P.

2025-07-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.16.665207 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predictive coding posits that the brain continuously generates and updates internal models to anticipate incoming sensory input. While auditory and visual modalities have been studied independently in this context, direct comparisons using matched paradigms are scarce. Here, we employed magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate how the brain of 83 participants encodes and consciously recognises temporally unfolding sequences that acquire Gestalt-like structure over time, a feature rarely addressed in cross-modal research. Participants memorised matched auditory and visual sequences with coherent temporal structure and later identified whether test sequences were familiar or novel. Multivariate decoding revealed robust discrimination between the brain mechanisms underlying encoding and recognition of memorised and novel sequences, with sustained temporal generalisation in the auditory domain and time-specific responses in the visual domain. Using the BROAD-NESS pipeline, we identified modality-specific and supramodal brain networks. Auditory memory engaged auditory cortex, cingulate gyrus, and hippocampus, whereas visual memory involved orbitofrontal cortex and visual areas. Notably, both modalities recruited a shared network including hippocampus and medial cingulate during recognition. These findings provide compelling evidence for distinct and shared predictive learning mechanisms across sensory systems, advancing our understanding of how the brain integrates and evaluates temporally structured, Gestalt-like information.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.