Back

Aberrant splicing prediction during human organ development

Wagner, N.; Neverov, A. M.; Martin-Geary, A. C.; Londhe, S.; Schröder, C.; Yepez, V. A.; Whiffin, N.; Gagneur, J.

2025-07-20 genomics
10.1101/2025.07.16.665183 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developmental disorders constitute a major class of genetic diseases, yet tools to identify splicing-disruptive variants during development are lacking. To address this need we extended the AbSplice framework to incorporate splicing dynamics across developmental stages. Moreover, we introduced several improvements including a refined ground truth from the aberrant splicing caller FRASER2, a continuous representation of splice site usage, and integration of the rich set of predictions from the sequence-based model Pangolin. These advances improve the performance of the original model at predicting aberrant splicing events and enable predictions across embryonic, childhood, and adult tissues. Genome-wide scores for all single-nucleotide variants and a web interface to score indels are available to facilitate the exploration of the predictions. Our genome-wide predictions reveal a class of variants with splicing-disruptive effects confined to early development, particularly abundant in the brain (>18,000 variants). These variants are enriched in loss-of-function intolerant genes and neurodevelopmental disorder genes. Within the rare-disease cohort Solve-RD high-impact brain-specific predictions are significantly enriched in individuals affected by neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) in NDD-linked genes. Furthermore, the predicted developmental timing of the splicing disruption correlates with the clinical age of onset. Analysis of genomes of individuals with a suspected Mendelian disorder from Genomics England identified 26 unique variants in disease-linked genes, with stronger predicted effects during development than in adulthood, including a candidate new diagnosis in the gene FGFR1. Altogether, these results improve the accuracy of splice-disruptive variant prediction and provide tissue and developmental context to aid interpretation in rare disease diagnostics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.