Deformed Probability Estimation in Goal-Directed reinforcement learning model explains anxious-depression dimensions of psychiatric disorders
Yazdani, S.; Nili Ahmadabadi, M.; Nadjar-Araabi, B.; Vahabie, A.-h.
Show abstract
Psychiatric disorders are complex, multi-dimensional pathologies rooted in diverse cognitive processes. Computational psychiatry aims to reveal distortions in these processes through behavior modeling, providing a deeper understanding of psychiatric disorders. Previous studies, using Daws two-stage task, had linked the imbalance between habitual/model-free and goal-directed/model-based behaviors to disorders with compulsive behaviors and intrusive thoughts. The model-based component relies on the estimation of environmental probabilities. Therefore, we added a well-known deformation in subjective probability estimation to the model and this improved the model fitting. More importantly, the fitted deformation explains some variance of the anxious-depression dimension of psychiatric symptoms. The deformation parameter is aligned with the description-experience gap in decision-making literature. Our results point to subjective possibly distortion as the probable underlying cognitive process of anxiety, apathy, and depression. This study also shows that the inclusion of cognitive biases in modeling can extract the hidden aspects of behavior possibility linked to disorders. Our approach enhances the precision of computational psychiatry and provides deeper insights into the cognitive processes underlying psychiatric symptoms, paving the way for more effective, personalized therapeutic strategies. Significance StatementThis study builds on a previously used model and Data that indicated a correlation between Model-Based preference and certain psychiatric disorders. By adding distortion to the probability estimation, we identified a new parameter correlated with depression and anxiety. The augmented model demonstrates an improved fit to behavior and aligns with Gillans previous findings. Our approach enhances the precision of computational psychiatry and provides deeper insights into the cognitive processes underlying psychiatric symptoms, paving the way for more effective, personalized therapeutic strategies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of body image dissatisfaction on goal-directed decision making in a population marked by negative appearance beliefs and disordered eating 93%
- Effect of Acute Stress on Working Memory in Pilots: Investigating the Modulatory Role of Memory Load 92%
- Understanding mental health trends during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States using network analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Psychiatry Research Map (CPSYMAP): a New Database for Visualizing Research Papers 93%
- Machine Learning Models Predict the Emergence of Depression in Argentinean College Students during Periods of COVID-19 Quarantine 93%
- Understanding Psychiatric Illness Through Natural Language Processing (UNDERPIN): Rationale, Design, and Methodology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning approach for automatic assessment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in patients using R-R intervals 91%
- A Bayesian computational model reveals a failure to adapt interoceptive precision estimates across depression, anxiety, eating, and substance use disorders 91%
- Directed exploration in the Iowa Gambling Task: model-free and model-based analyses in a large dataset of young and old healthy participants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning-Based Model for Behavioral Analysis in Rodents: Application to the Forced Swim Test 90%
- Insomnia and problematic gaming: a study in 9 low- and middle- incomes countries 90%
- Tensor decomposition- and principal component analysis-based unsupervised feature extraction to select more reasonable differentially expressed genes: Optimization of standard deviation versus state-of-art methods 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.