Back

Thematic analysis of a United Kingdom-wide survey to explore womens perceptions and concerns about assisted reproductive technology

Afzal, F.; Wong, L. Y. F.; PURKAYASTHA, M.; Lu, Y.; Rees, P.; Richard, M.; Williams, C.; Lupo, P.; Luke, B.; Sutcliffe, A. G.

2025-07-18 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.07.16.25331627 medRxiv
Show abstract

Over 300,000 children were born in the United Kingdom (UK) through assisted reproductive technology (ART). ART is associated with prematurity and congenital anomalies, while long-term health risks are currently considered low. Large-scale qualitative research exploring womens perspectives on these issues remains limited. Therefore, this study investigates womens concerns about health and educational outcomes following ART, and their views on information provision and national database studies. Women who underwent ART, were considering ART or conceived naturally were invited to participate voluntarily. An anonymous online survey was distributed via social media channels of a UK-based fertility charity and accepted responses for 8 months. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis, and descriptive statistics were produced for categorical responses. Of the 562 participants, most were aged 25-40 (74.5%), White (93.2%) and held a degree or higher qualification (87.9%). The majority underwent ART through the private sector (42.3%) in the 2020s (69.1%) and had successful childbirth (52.4%). While up to 82.5% of respondents reported no health and educational concerns, others were concerned about reproductive, endocrine and hormone treatment-related cancer risks in themselves, in addition to potential reproductive, neurological and developmental issues in their offspring. Most participants (up to 91.9%) stated they received no information about ART-related health and educational outcomes in themselves and their child; those who did cited healthcare professionals or videos as sources. More than half (68.3%) supported using national databases to study childrens outcomes, and they expressed that such findings should be disseminated sensitively through healthcare professionals before treatment. Although most women reported no concerns or information about long-term health and educational outcomes for themselves or their children, many expressed concerns. The lack of information and support for database studies can inform patient-centred communication that addresses womens concerns. Future ART studies may consider incorporating patient and public involvement surveys to shape research priorities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.2%
5
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
24
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%