Back

Structural and enzymatic divergence between human MDH isoforms underlies their specialized regulatory roles in metabolism

Berndsen, C. E.; Kayll, A. J.; Rahman, R.; Tester, J. R.; Beaver, T.; tuck, C.; Neve-Hoversten, S.; Gentile, L.; Mandanis, T.; Provost, J. J.

2025-07-15 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.07.15.665002 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Malate dehydrogenase (MDH: EC:1.1.1.37) catalyzes a key NAD+-dependent redox reaction integral to cellular metabolism. In humans, the cytosolic (hMDH1) and mitochondrial (hMDH2) isoforms operate in distinct compartments, suggesting potential differences in regulation. Here, we present a comparative analysis of hMDH1 and hMDH2 under physiologically relevant conditions, integrating enzymatic assays, ligand binding studies, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and molecular modeling. Our findings reveal that hMDH2 activity is inhibited by -ketoglutarate, glutamate, NAD+, ATP, and citrate at concentrations consistent with mitochondrial metabolic states characterized by elevated amino acid catabolism or redox stress. Conversely, hMDH1 exhibits minimal impact by these metabolites, with only modest inhibition observed in the presence of ATP and ADP. SAXS analyses confirm that both isoforms maintain stable dimeric structures upon ligand binding, indicating that regulation is not mediated by global conformational changes. Structural modeling and normal mode analyses identify increased flexibility in hMDH1, particularly within the active site loop, thumb loop, and a partially disordered C-terminal helix. In contrast, hMDH2 displays a more rigid architecture and a more electropositive active site environment, correlating with its heightened sensitivity to anionic metabolites. Fluorescence quenching experiments further support these distinctions, demonstrating stronger binding affinities for nucleotide-based ligands in hMDH2 compared to hMDH1. Collectively, these results suggest that isoform-specific regulation of human MDH arises from differences in local structural dynamics and electrostatics, rather than large-scale structural rearrangements. hMDH2 appears adapted to integrate mitochondrial metabolic signals, modulating malate oxidation in response to cellular conditions, while hMDH1 maintains consistent cytosolic function across diverse metabolic states.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
26.2%
2
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
3
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
7
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
10
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Biochimie
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Molecular Microbiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
20
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Redox Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Protein Engineering, Design and Selection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%