Back

Early time-restricted eating improves an actigraphy-estimated sleep quality in women with overweight or obesity

Peters, B.; Jokisch, J.; Schwarz, J.; Schuppelius, B.; Pfeiffer, A. F. H.; Michalsen, A.; Kramer, A.; Pivovarova-Ramich, O.

2025-07-16 nutrition
10.1101/2025.07.15.25331590
Show abstract

Background & AimsMetabolic disorders are tightly linked to sleep disturbances. First evidence showed that time-restricted eating (TRE), a growingly popular approach to combat cardiometabolic diseases, can also affect sleep quality. Recommendations for a preferable eating time window are pending. Our aim was to investigate the effects von early and late TRE on sleep quality in women with overweight and obesity. MethodsA total of 31 women with overweight and obesity were included in the controlled randomized crossover study ChronoFast. After a 2-4-week baseline period, participants were randomly allocated to two-weeks early time-restricted eating (eTRE) or late time-restricted eating (lTRE). The phases were switched after a washout phase. During dietary interventions participants were only allowed to consume caloric foods and drinks in the restricted eating window (eTRE: 8 am toTRE 4 pm; lTRE: 1 pm to 9 pm). Assessment of sleep metrics was performed subjectively, using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and self-report of sleep quality, and objectively, by blinded actigraphy. Hunger and satiety scores were examined using a visual analogue scale (VAS). ResultsWhile subjective sleep quality (PSQI and self-reported sleep quality) remained unchanged, an improvement of sleep efficiency (p = 0.047) and sleep fragmentation index (SFI) (p = 0.029) was observed in eTRE intervention compared to baseline as estimated by actigraphy. There were no correlations between hunger and satiety and sleep quality, with no differences of hunger and satiety scores between eTRE and lTRE assessed in the evening on the last day of each intervention. ConclusionseTRE but not lTRE improved objective sleep-quality, which was not related to the feeling of hunger and satiety. eTRE might be more effective strategy for well-being and sleep-related metabolic health outcomes. ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT04351672 (registered on April 17, 2020).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 0.1%
13.2%
2
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
7.6%
4
Frontiers in Nutrition
based on 13 papers
Top 0.3%
7.6%
5
Journal of Sleep Research
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
6.4%
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 63%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Nutrition
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 1.0%
4.5%
9
Current Developments in Nutrition
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
4.5%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 43%
4.5%
11
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 29%
2.9%
13
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
based on 16 papers
Top 0.6%
2.9%
14
Sleep Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
2.8%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 6%
2.4%
16
Public Health Nutrition
based on 14 papers
Top 1.0%
2.4%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 14%
1.6%
18
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Public Health
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 26%
0.7%
23
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 18%
0.7%