Genetically informed drug target prioritisation and repurposing for major depressive disorder
ter Kuile, A. R.; Finan, C.; Chopade, S.; Van Vugt, M.; Hukerikar, N.; Barral, S.; Stringaris, A.; Schmidt, A. F.; Kuchenbaecker, K.; Pingault, J.-B.
Show abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) treatments have limited efficacy and target few mechanisms, highlighting the need for innovative drug discovery. Drugs targeting genetically supported proteins are 2.6 times more likely to succeed in drug development. Here, we use genetic methods to identify and prioritise MDD drug targets, leveraging genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from >525,000 MDD cases. We derived exposure data from 10 GWAS measuring protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) and gene expression levels (eQTLs) in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain tissues. We performed cis- Mendelian randomisation (MR) on 3,469 druggable targets (genes encoding proteins targeted by existing compounds or experimentally predicted to be druggable). To strengthen causal inference, we implemented robust MR estimators, colocalisation, external replication, and assessed directional consistency across tissues. We integrated MR effect directions with drug mechanisms and clinical annotations to infer potential therapeutic effects. Validation analyses showed that 82% of drugs approved for depression/anxiety had [≥]1 significant MR target, compared to 51% for compounds in clinical trials. For repurposing, we prioritised 54 targets of compounds developed for other conditions with estimated beneficial effects on MDD (e.g., an inhibitor for a risk-increasing target). Ten high-priority targets of brain-penetrating compounds included ACE and NISCH (cardiovascular drugs), NDUFA2, NDUFB6, and NDUFS1 (metformin), CDK4, NTRK3, and MET (oncology inhibitors), and GLS and NOS2 (enzyme inhibitors). We found genetic evidence for established and novel MDD targets across the drug development pipeline. Novel targets point to mechanisms beyond monoaminergic systems, most with approved drugs for other conditions, offering immediate repurposing opportunities.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A brain-enriched circRNA blood biomarker can predict response to SSRI antidepressants 94%
- Genome-wide association study of problematic opioid prescription use in 132,113 23andMe research participants of European ancestry 94%
- Gene expression signatures of response to fluoxetine treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitive period-regulating genetic pathways and exposure to adversity shape risk for depression 93%
- Novel polygenic risk score links depression-related cortical transcriptomic changes to brain morphology and depressive symptoms in men 93%
- Identifying Nootropic Drug Targets via Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS and Transcriptomics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-analysis of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolic activity on antidepressant response from 13 clinical studies using genotype imputation 93%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 93%
- A polygenic predictor of treatment-resistant depression using whole exome sequencing and genome-wide genotyping 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.