Back

Parent/caregiver needs during pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a scoping literature review

Murali, P.; Yu, J.-H.

2025-07-16 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.07.15.25331533 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe integration of genome-wide sequencing (GWS), including whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing, has transformed pediatric diagnostics, yet the needs of parents and caregivers during this process remain insufficiently explored. This scoping review aims to synthesize current knowledge on parental and caregiver needs across the GWS process in pediatric settings to inform better clinical practices and support systems. MethodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were searched, yielding 574 studies, with 47 meeting the inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, clinical settings, and identified parental needs categorized into pre-test, interim, and post-test periods. Conventional content analysis was used to inductively code and identify themes. ResultsParental needs were categorized into two main themes: (1) Informational needs, encompassing tailored communication, understanding prognosis, logistics, and evolving information, and (2) Emotional support, emphasizing the importance of initial provider interactions and support from healthcare providers and peer groups. Informational and emotional needs were interrelated, impacting parents overall experiences. The review highlighted significant gaps during the interim waiting period, with needs largely focused on pre- and post-test periods. ConclusionParents navigating the pediatric GWS process require comprehensive informational and emotional support. Effective communication before testing and empathetic follow-up contribute to positive experiences. Addressing gaps at different time throughout the process and fostering continuous provider and peer support can enhance the integration of GWS in pediatric care, improving family-centered outcomes.

Published in Journal of Genetic Counseling · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.