Sex Differences in Excess Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Doniec, K. J.; Schoeley, J.; Kuhn, M.; Dowd, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was a significant global mortality shock. In addition to baseline differences in mortality risk, males often face a survival disadvantage in crisis situations such as famines and epidemics. Although many countries have reported higher numbers of male COVID-19 deaths, the evolution of sex differences in mortality over the course of the pandemic, and how these differences compare using both relative (accounting for higher male baseline mortality) and absolute measures remains underexplored. MethodsWe examined sex differences in excess mortality from March 2020 to July 2023 using data from 33 countries in the Short-Term Mortality Fluctuations dataset. We estimate both absolute (male excess mortality - female excess mortality) and relative (male P-score - female P-score) sex differences in COVID-related mortality. We analysed the sex gap monthly and across three pandemic phases: pre-vaccine, post-vaccine, and endemic. ResultsIn most countries, absolute male excess mortality exceeded that of females during the pre-vaccine phase of the pandemic. While the overall male disadvantage in total excess deaths gradually declined throughout the pandemic, it remained more pronounced in countries with delayed mortality peaks. The evidence for relative male disadvantage was weaker overall, and this gap further narrowed during the endemic phase. In some contexts, such as Nordic countries, women even experienced higher relative excess mortality later in the pandemic. Sex differences in absolute excess mortality tended to grow with age, but there was no clear pattern in the relative sex differences across age groups. ConclusionsWhile previous research has highlighted a male disadvantage in COVID-19 mortality based on absolute death counts, our study shows that this pattern was concentrated in the pre-vaccine phase and declined over time. Relative increases in mortality were often similar between sexes and, in some cases, greater among women. These findings suggest that sex differences in COVID-19 mortality were more varied than commonly assumed and underscore the importance of using both absolute and relative measures to assess the impact of health crises on population subgroups. Finally, our results suggest that COVID-19 did not produce lasting shifts in pre-pandemic sex differences in mortality.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Faltering survival improvements at young-middle ages in high-income English-speaking countries: population-level period and cohort analyses 94%
- Quantifying impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic through life expectancy losses: a population-level study of 29 countries 94%
- Changes in stillbirths and child and youth mortality in 2020 and 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct and indirect mortality impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, March 2020-April 2021 93%
- The World Mortality Dataset: Tracking excess mortality across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Social Contact Patterns and Implications for Infectious Disease Transmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Contact Surveys 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The contribution of population age-sex structure to the excess mortality estimates of 2020–2021 in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden 95%
- Excess death among Latino people in California during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The gender gap in adolescent mental health: a cross-national investigation of 566,827 adolescents across 73 countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex differences in the mortality rate for coronavirus disease 2019 compared to other causes of death 96%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 92%
- Differential risk of healthcare workers versus the general population during outbreak, war and pandemic crises 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.