Neural processing of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): EEG speech decoding, power and classifier investigations
Keshavarzi, M.; Richards, S.; Feltham, G.; Parvez, L.; Goswami, U.
Show abstract
The sensory/neural Temporal Sampling (TS) theory of developmental language disorder (DLD) is based on the sensory and linguistic impairments in rhythm processing that are found in children with both developmental dyslexia (DD) and DLD. These sensory/linguistic impairments include decreased sensitivity to amplitude rise times (ARTs), syllable stress patterns and speech rhythm. They are explained via a neural oscillatory speech processing framework drawn from the adult literature. Notably, at the neural level TS theory predicts impairments in the cortical tracking of different rates of amplitude modulation (AM) in the speech signal <10Hz. To date, the accuracy of low-frequency cortical tracking in natural continuous speech has not been measured in children with DLD. Here, EEG was recorded during story listening from children with and without DLD aged around 9 years, and decoding analyses in the delta, theta and alpha (control) bands were carried out. EEG power was computed in the delta, theta and gamma bands, as was phase-amplitude versus phase-phase coupling (PAC, PPC) between bands. The expectation that the accuracy of low-frequency decoding (delta, theta) of the speech signal would be impaired in DLD was not supported. Further, theta-delta and theta-gamma PAC were not atypical, contrary to prediction. EEG power in all bands was elevated for the DLD group, however. Receiving-operator-characteristic (ROC) curves estimated using support vector machine and logistic regression showed that these simple band power measures provided classifier models with the highest areas under the curves (AUC). The data are discussed using TS theory. HighlightsO_LICortical decoding accuracy for speech envelope information < 10 Hz is intact in DLD. C_LIO_LIChildren with DLD show greater EEG power in delta, theta, and low gamma frequencies. C_LIO_LILow-gamma EEG power yields the best DLD classification performance (AUC = 0.81). C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reactive Inhibitory Control Precedes Overt Stuttering Events 96%
- Pars opercularis underlies efferent predictions and successful auditory feedback processing in speech: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke 96%
- Assessing the sensitivity of EEG-based frequency-tagging as a metric for statistical learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Domain-general cognitive control processes in bilingual switching: evidence from midfrontal theta oscillations 96%
- More than Words: Neurophysiological Correlates of Semantic Dissimilarity Depend on Comprehension of the Speech Narrative 95%
- Hearing loss is associated with delayed neural responses to continuous speech 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of reading experience in atypical cortical tracking of speech and speech-in-noise in dyslexia 97%
- Atypical MEG inter-subject correlation during listening to continuous natural speech in dyslexia 97%
- Development of infants' neural speech processing and its relation to later language skills: an MEG study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexia 95%
- The Effects of Speech Masking on Neural Tracking of Acoustic and Semantic Features of Natural Speech 95%
- Modulations of right hemisphere connectivity in young children relates to the perception of spoken words 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.