Back

Development of male-sterile lines of Setaria viridis to accelerate C4 model plant genetics

Jiang, H.; Myers, E.; Millman, B.; Lee, D.-Y.; Nusinow, D. A.; Voytas, D.; Baxter, I.

2025-07-18 plant biology
10.1101/2025.07.14.664229 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Setaria viridis is a diploid C4 grass in the Poaceae family, notable for its rapid life cycle of 6-8 weeks from sowing to seed--much shorter than the 4-5 months required by crops such as Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor. This fast growth makes S. viridis a valuable model for C4 crop research. Genetic crosses are essential for studying gene function, but manual crossing is labor-intensive and time-consuming. To address this, we developed a male-sterile line by targeting the S. viridis ortholog of Setaria italica NO POLLEN 1 (SiNP1), which encodes a glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase required for pollen exine formation. Using Cas9 and TREX2-mediated genome editing, we generated SiNP1 knockouts in both the S. viridis ME034V and A10.1 backgrounds that were fully male-sterile. Backcrossing T0 male-sterile plants to ME034V yielded a stable line homozygous for a 59 bp deletion, easily genotyped by PCR. Using this line, we developed a simple and efficient crossing protocol that eliminates the need for emasculation. This method enables a single person to perform up to 100 crosses per day--compared to 15 using traditional methods--and yields 20-32 F1 hybrid seeds per panicle with 100% genetic purity. We also quantified pollen flow and outcrossing frequencies under greenhouse conditions to develop optimal bagging strategies and prevent unintended pollination.This resource accelerates genetic research in S. viridis, enhancing its utility as a premier C4 model for mapping and functional genomics.

Published in The Plant Journal (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.