Back

CDK8 Inhibition Releases the Muscle Differentiation Block in Fusion-driven Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma

Zhang, S.; Engel, K.; Fahs, A.; Malone, C.; Ross, K.; Just, M.; Guedes, B.; Granum, D.; Oristian, K. M.; Kovach, A.; Alexe, G.; Digiovanni, G.; Barbar, L.; Bentley, R.; Cerda-Smith, C.; Le Roux, O.; Mendes, E.; Zimmerman, S. P.; Rees, M.; Roth, J.; Shern, J. F.; Wood, K. C.; Counter, C. M.; Linardic, C. M.; Stegmaier, K.

2025-07-18 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.14.663986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (aRMS) is a fusion-driven pediatric cancer with poor survival and limited therapeutic options. To uncover novel vulnerabilities, we employed complex-based analysis of the DepMap functional genomic data, identifying CDK8 as a dependency in aRMS. Both CDK8 knockout and pharmacologic inhibition impaired tumor cell growth and induced myogenic differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Compared to genetic loss, CDK8 inhibition induced more dynamic transcriptional changes. With a genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 drug modifier screen, we determined that the maximal anti-tumor activity of the CDK8 inhibitor requires the presence of the Mediator kinase module and transcriptional cooperation with the SAGA complex. We further identified SIX4 as a key transcription factor mediating CDK8 inhibitor-induced transcriptional activation of myogenic differentiation genes and tumor cell proliferation. These findings suggest a distinct gain-of-function mechanism of the CDK8 inhibitor and establish a strong rationale for CDK8 inhibition as a differentiation-inducing therapeutic strategy in aRMS. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEWe provide a framework for uncovering therapeutic targets by network-based analysis of functional genomic screens. We identify CDK8 as a druggable target in aRMS and determine that CDK8 inhibition drives myogenic differentiation and impairs tumor progression via a collaborative mechanism involving the Mediator kinase module, SAGA complex, and SIX4.

Published in Cancer Discovery (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.