The Prognostic Role of IRS2 in Breast Cancer: Interactions with Glucose Metabolism and Menopausal Status
Liu, K.; Shah, A.; Ramshankar, G.; Perry, R. J.
Show abstract
The Insulin Receptor Substrate 2 (IRS2) gene encodes an adapter protein that transmits insulin signals to regulate various cell functions, including metabolism, growth, and survival. Dysregulation of IRS2 activity is often associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Both conditions are strongly associated with a higher breast cancer risk. IRS2 is predominantly regulated in various tissues at the level of expression; however, the association between tumor IRS2 expression and certain clinical factors, such as diabetes status and menopausal status, and their effects on breast cancer prognosis are not fully understood. To address this gap, we utilized five datasets of bulk RNA-seq data of patients with breast cancer from the Xena Functional Genomics Explorer, and primarily analyzed the TCGA Breast Cancer Cohort, which includes data from 1097 patients with primary breast tumors. We complemented these transcriptomic analyses by using 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FLT PET-CT) scans from 23 patients that were publicly available from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) to correlate this marker of tumor cell proliferation with body mass index (BMI) and glucose levels (as a proxy for diabetes), and further divided data by menopausal status. Through deidentified, publicly available data, the study explores the effects of IRS2 expression on breast cancer in different cohorts, as well as the role of menopausal status in this dynamic and the context of obesity and diabetes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A genome-wide association study of mammographic texture variation 95%
- Effect of testosterone therapy on breast tissue composition and mammographic breast density in trans masculine individuals 95%
- Claudin-low-like mouse mammary tumors show distinct transcriptomic patterns uncoupled from genomic drivers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hormone Receptor-status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape 96%
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 95%
- From Variability to Standardization: The Impact of Breast Density on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and the Need for a Structured Reporting System 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II 95%
- Reprogramming breast cancer cells to breast cancer stem cell-like by the POU1F1 transcription factor 94%
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Variance in Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase-1 Expression on Breast Cancer Prognosis is Stratified by Clinical and Anthropometric Factors 98%
- Factors associated with breast lesions among women attending select teaching and referral health facilities in Kenya: A cross-sectional study 94%
- The novel microRNAs hsa-miR-nov7 and hsa-miR-nov3 are over-expressed in locally advanced breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of KPNA2 mutations in breast cancer prognosis: A survey of publicly available databases 97%
- NSMCE2, a Novel Super-Enhancer Regulated Gene, is Linked to Poor Prognosis and Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer 93%
- Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.