Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pharmacological Treatments: a Scoping Review
Martinez-De la Torre, A.; Leshetkina, P.; Ahanor, O.; Maritz, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting approximately 0.5-1.0% of the adult population and is a significant contributor of disability worldwide. While Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for evaluating pharmacological treatments, they often fail to capture outcomes that reflect patients lived experiences, also referred to as functioning. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Brief Core Set for RA offers a standardized, patient-centered framework for assessing functioning across relevant domains. ObjectiveTo examine the extent to which functioning-related outcomes in Phase III pharmacological RCTs for RA align with the ICF Brief Core Set for RA and to identify the most frequently represented functioning categories. MethodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Literature was searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2010 to 2025. Phase III RCTs evaluating pharmacological interventions in adult patients with RA were included. Functioning-related outcomes were extracted and mapped to ICF categories using standardized linking rules. ResultsOf 852 records screened, 91 met the inclusion criteria. Functioning was frequently assessed through patient-reported outcomes and composite clinical measures. The most commonly linked ICF categories included sensation of pain (b280) and mobility of joint functions (b710) from the body functions domain; walking (d450) and carrying out daily routine (d230) from the activities and participation domain; and structures of the shoulder (s720), upper (s730), and lower extremities (s740) from the body structures domain. However, none of the studies explicitly used the ICF framework. ConclusionFunctioning is implicitly assessed in RA pharmacological trials, yet the ICF framework remains underutilized. Explicit integration of the ICF Brief Core Set for RA into trial design could improve the standardization, comparability, and patient-centeredness of outcome measurement, ensuring that clinical research better reflects what matters most to individuals living with RA.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A new indicator to measure discordance between patient reported outcomes and traditional disease activity holds promise to advance care trajectories improve care in patients with early Rheumatoid Arthritis 96%
- Prodromal symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in a primary care database: variation by ethnicity and socioeconomic status 94%
- Different Covid-19 Outcomes Among Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: A Nation-wide Cohort Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis definition and model generated through patient and multi-disciplinary professional modified Delphi process 95%
- Pharmacological treatment for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung involvement: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 94%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for managing fatigue across the lifespan of people living with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Registration of Trials: Where we are, why, and how we could get better 94%
- Clinical Trials in COVID-19 Management & Prevention: A Meta-epidemiological Study examining methodological quality 90%
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Outcomes of Patients with COVID-19 and Chronic Inflammatory and Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Multicentric Matched-Cohort Study 93%
- A Randomized Clinical Trial Of 2-Week Methotrexate Discontinuation In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Vaccinated With Inactivated SARS-COV-2 Vaccine 93%
- Risk factors for hospital admission related to COVID-19 in inflammatory rheumatic diseases 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.