Back

Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pharmacological Treatments: a Scoping Review

Martinez-De la Torre, A.; Leshetkina, P.; Ahanor, O.; Maritz, R.

2025-07-14 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.07.14.25331488 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting approximately 0.5-1.0% of the adult population and is a significant contributor of disability worldwide. While Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for evaluating pharmacological treatments, they often fail to capture outcomes that reflect patients lived experiences, also referred to as functioning. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Brief Core Set for RA offers a standardized, patient-centered framework for assessing functioning across relevant domains. ObjectiveTo examine the extent to which functioning-related outcomes in Phase III pharmacological RCTs for RA align with the ICF Brief Core Set for RA and to identify the most frequently represented functioning categories. MethodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Literature was searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2010 to 2025. Phase III RCTs evaluating pharmacological interventions in adult patients with RA were included. Functioning-related outcomes were extracted and mapped to ICF categories using standardized linking rules. ResultsOf 852 records screened, 91 met the inclusion criteria. Functioning was frequently assessed through patient-reported outcomes and composite clinical measures. The most commonly linked ICF categories included sensation of pain (b280) and mobility of joint functions (b710) from the body functions domain; walking (d450) and carrying out daily routine (d230) from the activities and participation domain; and structures of the shoulder (s720), upper (s730), and lower extremities (s740) from the body structures domain. However, none of the studies explicitly used the ICF framework. ConclusionFunctioning is implicitly assessed in RA pharmacological trials, yet the ICF framework remains underutilized. Explicit integration of the ICF Brief Core Set for RA into trial design could improve the standardization, comparability, and patient-centeredness of outcome measurement, ensuring that clinical research better reflects what matters most to individuals living with RA.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.5%
2
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
5
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Arthritis Research & Therapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%