Back

Mitochondrial clone tracing within spatially intact human tissues

Bracht, S. A.; Rong, J.; Gier, R. A.; DeMarshall, M.; Golden, H.; Dhakal, D.; McDevitt, J. C.; Mo, F.; Furth, E. E.; Strauss Starling, A.; Muir, A. B.; Falk, G. W.; Katona, B. W.; Stanger, B. Z.; Zhang, N. R.; Shaffer, S. M.

2025-07-17 genomics
10.1101/2025.07.11.664452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding tissue development and intra-tissue evolution requires the ability to trace clones in intact tissues coupled with high-plex molecular profiling preserving spatial context. However, current lineage tracing tools are incompatible with spatial omics. Here, we present SUMMIT (Spatially Unveiling Mitochondrial Mutations In Tissues), a spatially-resolved lineage tracing technology that integrates gene expression profiling with mitochondrial mutation-based clone identification. Unlike synthetic lineage recording methods, SUMMIT relies only on endogenous mutations and thus can be applied to human tissues. To address the compositional mixing of cell types within spatial spots, SUMMIT includes a rigorous statistical framework to confidently assign variants to specific cell subpopulations and achieves high power for spatially localized clones by pooling information across neighboring spots. We validated SUMMIT using a controlled model in which we mixed two cancer cell lines in a mouse tumor, then demonstrated it on multiple human tissues including Barretts esophagus, gastric cardia, small bowel, and colorectal cancer. Across these samples, we distinguished between global mutations and mutations marking locally restricted clones. The coupled transcriptomic data allowed us to characterize the cell type composition within each clone and delineate their spatial configuration. This integrated approach provides a framework to understand spatially-defined clonal evolution in preserved human tissue.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.