Back

Twice as nice: Boosts in adolescent reinforcement learning from Pavlovian bias and age-related prioritization of reward-motivated incidental memory.

Hegefeld, H. M.; Davidow, J. Y.

2025-07-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.11.664442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adolescence is a period marked by profound changes in both capacities for learning and the motivational drives that guide behavior. Motivated learning, including the ability to associate cues with actions that lead to positive or negative outcomes, is a fundamental component of adaptive behavior and is essential for survival. Equally important is the encoding of events during learning, which may be influenced by the valence of outcomes. Given the substantial neurocognitive changes in motivated learning and memory that occur from childhood to adulthood, adolescence provides a unique window to investigate mechanisms of these adaptive behaviors. Yet, we know surprisingly little about the development of these behaviors, with sparse extant research fraught with inconsistent findings. In this study, we examined motivated learning and incidental memory using a validated affective learning task in a sample of 174 participants aged 8 to 25 years. The task orthogonalized action and outcome valence and included incidental encoding of trial-unique images presented during feedback, followed by a delayed memory test. We show that adolescents outperform both children and adults in learning by leveraging Pavlovian response biases. In contrast, children exhibit enhanced memory for stimuli associated with positive outcomes compared to adolescents and adults. These findings point to distinct developmental advantages: enhanced learning performance in adolescence and enhanced memory for rewarding events in childhood, each potentially adaptive at their respective developmental stages. Together, these findings suggest opportunities to leverage learning and memory in youth for practical applications, such as education and policy setting.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
4
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.0%
7
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
14
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
18
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
24
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%