Context-dependent regulatory variants in Alzheimer's disease
Chen, Z.; Liu, Y.; Brown, A. R.; Sestili, H.; Ramamurthy, E.; Xiong, X.; Prokopenko, D.; Phan, B. N.; Gadey, L.; Hu, P.; Tsai, L.-H.; Bertram, L.; Hide, W.; Tanzi, R. E.; Kellis, M.; Pfenning, A. R.
Show abstract
Noncoding genetic variants underlie many complex diseases, yet identifying and interpreting their functional impacts remains challenging. Late-onset Alzheimers disease (LOAD), a polygenic neurodegenerative disorder, exemplifies this challenge. The disease is strongly associated with noncoding variation, including common variants enriched in microglial enhancers and rare variants that are hypothesized to influence neurodevelopment and synaptic plasticity. These variants often perturb regulatory sequences by disrupting transcription factor (TF) motifs or altering local TF interactions, thereby reshaping gene expression and chromatin accessibility. However, assessing their impact is complicated by the context-dependent functions of regulatory sequences, underscoring the need to systematically examine variant effects across diverse tissues, cell types, and cellular states. Here, we combined in vitro and in vivo massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) with interpretable machine-learning models to systematically characterize common and rare variants across myeloid and neural contexts. Parallel profiling of variants in four immune states in vitro and three mouse brain regions in vivo revealed that individual variants can differentially and even oppositely modulate regulatory function depending on cell-type and cell-state contexts. Common variants associated with LOAD tended to exert stronger effects in immune contexts, whereas rare variants showed more pronounced impacts in brain contexts. Interpretable sequence-to-function deep-learning models elucidated how genetic variation leads to cell-type-specific differences in regulatory activity, pinpointing both direct transcription-factor motif disruptions and subtler tuning of motif context. To probe the broader functional consequences of a locus prioritized by our reporter assays and models, we used CRISPR interference to silence an enhancer within the SEC63-OSTM1 locus that harbors four functional rare variants, revealing its gatekeeper role in inflammation and amyloidogenesis. These findings underscore the context-dependent nature of noncoding variant effects in LOAD and provide a generalizable framework for the mechanistic interpretation of risk alleles in complex diseases.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Histone exchange sensors reveal variant specific dynamics in mouse embryonic stem cells 98%
- A cancer-associated RNA polymerase III identity drives robust transcription and expression of SNAR-A noncoding RNA 98%
- Projection-TAGs enable multiplex projection tracing and multi-modal profiling of projection neurons 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prioritization of autoimmune disease-associated genetic variants that perturb regulatory element activity in T cells 98%
- Tissue-specific enhancer-gene maps from multimodal single-cell data identify causal disease alleles 98%
- Single-cell DNA methylome and 3D genome atlas of the human subcutaneous adipose tissue 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of disease-associated chromatin accessibility QTLs across immune cell types and contexts 98%
- Gene regulatory network inference from CRISPR perturbations in primary CD4+ T cells elucidates the genomic basis of immune disease 97%
- Scalable Screening of Ternary-Code DNA methylation Dynamics Associated with Human Traits. 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell epigenomic reconstruction of developmental trajectories in human neural organoid systems from pluripotency 98%
- Comparative molecular landscapes of immature neurons in the mammalian dentate gyrus across species reveal special features in humans 97%
- Genome-wide CRISPRi/a screens in human neurons link lysosomal failure to ferroptosis 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.