Back

Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model

Stockley, R. C.; Gooch, H.; Jarvis, K.; Watkins, C.

2025-07-15 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.07.11.25331266 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTechnologies comprise a broad range of applications with the potential to transform outcomes for the millions of people requiring rehabilitation each year. Despite this potential, many technologies are not successfully implemented into clinical practice. No single consistent approach or model is used to support their implementation into any form of rehabilitation. This study aimed to understand the influences upon rehabilitation technology implementation in the UKs National Health Service and, using this understanding, develop a comprehensive implementation model to support the adoption of rehabilitation technologies. MethodsA multi-methodological approach comprising qualitative enquiry and literature reviews was used to identify, analyse and group key factors that influenced rehabilitation technology implementation. FindingsSeven themes, identified from qualitative enquiry of 48 participants, representing 8 stakeholder groups in the UK, were integrated with published technology and implementation models to generate five key domains that comprise Rehabilitation Technology Implementation Model (RiTe). These domains were: evidence, technology, users, team and organisation. InterpretationThe RiTe model provides a novel and comprehensive understanding of the key factors that influence rehabilitation technology implementation and can be used to plan, support and evaluate implementation efforts. The demands of rehabilitation require repeated, frequent and prolonged participation in interventions by users with variable needs, which means that barriers and facilitators are likely to exert a magnified effect upon the process and success of implementation. Consequently, the key influencers of rehabilitation technology implementation identified in this study provide a critical opportunity to understand factors which could influence technology uptake in other clinical specialties, attesting to the value of the RiTe model to both rehabilitation and wider healthcare.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
8
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
23
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%