Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model
Stockley, R. C.; Gooch, H.; Jarvis, K.; Watkins, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundTechnologies comprise a broad range of applications with the potential to transform outcomes for the millions of people requiring rehabilitation each year. Despite this potential, many technologies are not successfully implemented into clinical practice. No single consistent approach or model is used to support their implementation into any form of rehabilitation. This study aimed to understand the influences upon rehabilitation technology implementation in the UKs National Health Service and, using this understanding, develop a comprehensive implementation model to support the adoption of rehabilitation technologies. MethodsA multi-methodological approach comprising qualitative enquiry and literature reviews was used to identify, analyse and group key factors that influenced rehabilitation technology implementation. FindingsSeven themes, identified from qualitative enquiry of 48 participants, representing 8 stakeholder groups in the UK, were integrated with published technology and implementation models to generate five key domains that comprise Rehabilitation Technology Implementation Model (RiTe). These domains were: evidence, technology, users, team and organisation. InterpretationThe RiTe model provides a novel and comprehensive understanding of the key factors that influence rehabilitation technology implementation and can be used to plan, support and evaluate implementation efforts. The demands of rehabilitation require repeated, frequent and prolonged participation in interventions by users with variable needs, which means that barriers and facilitators are likely to exert a magnified effect upon the process and success of implementation. Consequently, the key influencers of rehabilitation technology implementation identified in this study provide a critical opportunity to understand factors which could influence technology uptake in other clinical specialties, attesting to the value of the RiTe model to both rehabilitation and wider healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Can we enhance neurorehabilitation through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation? A mixed methods evaluation of NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL). 95%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 96%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
- Perspectives of Researchers and Clinicians on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: An Interview Study 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Telemedicine Ready or Not? a cross-sectional assessment of telemedicine maturity of federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria 92%
- Mobile consulting (mConsulting) as an option for accessing healthcare services for communities in remote rural areas and urban slums in low- and middle- income countries: A mixed methods study 92%
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.