Back

Diagnosability to inform species delimitation for the genus Emydura (Testudines: Chelidae) from northern Australia

Georges, A.; Unmack, P. J.; Kilian, A.; Zhang, X.; Amepou, Y.; Dissanayake, D. S. B.

2025-07-11 genetics
10.1101/2025.07.10.664252 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the evolutionary history of diversifying lineages and the delineation of species remain major challenges for evolutionary biology. Here we use single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and sequence fragment presence-absence (SilicoDArT) data to combine phylogenetics and population genetics to assess species boundaries with a focus on diagnosability. We challenge current and proposed taxonomies in a genus of Australian freshwater turtles (Chelidae: Emydura) from northern Australia and southern New Guinea. In a six-step process, we combine phylogeny with the concept of diagnosability based on fixed allelic differences to select diagnosable lineages as candidate species. Four taxa are supported as diagnosable lineages, two of which we elevate to species status. The nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies differed in important respects, which we attribute to recent or contemporary lateral transfer of mitochondria during hybridization events, deeper historical hybridization or possibly incomplete lineage sorting of the mitochondrial genome. Taxonomic decisions in cases of allopatry require subjective judgement. Our six-step strategy and the necessary (but not sufficient) criterion of diagnosability adds an additional level of objectivity before that subjectivity is applied, and so reduces the risk of taxonomic inflation that can accompany lineage approaches to species delimitation. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=124 SRC="FIGDIR/small/664252v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b89bc8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fb892dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1eb09a8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c7300c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.7%
2
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
11
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
14
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
21
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
25
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
27
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%