Volitional Attention to Color: Breaking Willed Attention out of the Spatial Domain
Nadra, J. G.; Sullivan, G.; Mangun, G. R.
Show abstract
Attention can be guided by either voluntary (top-down) or involuntary (bottom-up) influences. In real-world vision, voluntary attention can be directed by a wide range of influences such as reward, priming, meaning, experience, selection history, and volition. Laboratory studies of voluntary attention have commonly used attention-directing cues to induce or instruct human subjects to attend one class of stimuli while ignoring others. In recent years, free choice conditions of attention have been introduced, where self-generated volitional shifts of attention (willed attention) are possible (for a review, see Nadra & Mangun, 2023). Prior willed attention studies have focused on mechanisms of covert spatial attention, investigating the neurophysiological correlates of willed attention related to both post-decision processing, and the pre-decision brain activity patterns that predict participants free choices about where to attend. Much less work, however, has been done on willed non-spatial attention. In this study, in a fashion similar to prior willed spatial attention studies, we investigated willed attention to stimulus color. In a trial-by-trial cueing design, subjects were either cued what color to attend or were allowed to freely choose what color to attend, in order to subsequently discriminate visual features of the cued or willfully chosen target. Behavioral measures showed that the subjects were selectively attending the cued or willed color. Using support vector machine decoding on EEG alpha (8-12 Hz) signals, we found significant post-decision differences in alpha-band power and broadband EEG voltage when participants chose to attend to orange versus purple. However, in contrast to the findings in prior work on willed spatial attention, no pre-decision EEG signals could be identified that predicted which color participants would choose to attend to.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Electrophysiological Markers of Statistically Learned Attentional Enhancement: Evidence for a Saliency Based Mechanism 97%
- Steady-state visually evoked potentials and feature-based attention: Pre-registered null results and a focused review of methodological considerations. 97%
- Neural signatures of competition between voluntary and involuntary influences over the focus of attention in visual working memory 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- To See, Not to See, or to See Poorly: Perceptual Quality and Guess Rate as a Function of Electroencephalography (EEG) Brain Activity in an Orientation Perception Task 97%
- Predicting the irrelevant: Neural effects of distractor predictability depend on load 96%
- The Effect of Task on Object Processing revealed by EEG decoding 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lateralized alpha activity and slow potentials shifts over visual cortex track the time course of both endogenous and exogenous orienting of attention 97%
- Dynamics of alpha suppression and enhancement may be related to resource competition in cross-modal cortical regions 97%
- Causal Effects of Pupil Size on Visual Processing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attentional Modulations of Alpha Power Are Sensitive to the Task-relevance of Auditory Spatial Information 96%
- Linguistic and attentional factors -not statistical regularities- contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms 96%
- Interaction of spatial attention and the associated reward value of audiovisual stimuli 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.