Back

Controlling treatment toxicity in ovarian cancer to prime the patient for tumor extinction therapy

Gallagher, K.; Sousa, R. S.; Gatenbee, C. D.; Schenck, R.; Chen, P.; Citak, T.; Leither, S.; Mazzacurati, L.; Xella, A.; Zhou, Z.; Lemanne, D.; Rodriguez, P.; George, E.; Strobl, M. A. R.

2025-07-16 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.10.664235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) remains a major clinical challenge. In particular among those patients with homologous recombination (HR)-proficient tumors (>50%), most eventually succumb to their disease due to high recurrence rates, acquired resistance, and cumulative toxicity. This report summarizes work from the 12th IMO Workshop in which we explored an alternative "extinction therapy" strategy for frontline treatment of HGSOC. Inspired by ecological principles, this multi-strike approach aims to eradicate tumors not through a singular "magic bullet" but through a series of therapies after standard frontline treatment when the tumor is still, and perhaps most, vulnerable. We present a framework leveraging mathematical modeling (MM) to develop personalized multi-strike protocols for HGSOC. Key contributions include: 1) An "IMOme" score using liquid biopsy data to assess patient-specific hematopoietic toxicity risk, guiding the timing and selection of subsequent therapies, 2) MM strategies to design effective lowdose combinations of targeted agents to achieve synthetic lethality while managing toxicity, and 3) A MM framework to analyze the interplay between chemotherapy, gut microbiome toxicity, and immunotherapy, demonstrating how mitigating microbiome damage could enhance immune response. Overall, the computational approaches presented herein aim to support the design of personalized, multi-strike regimens in the frontline setting that proactively target tumor extinction while managing toxicity, ultimately seeking to deliver cures for patients with HGSOC.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.4%
2
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.7%
4
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
6
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.4%
16
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
25
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
28
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%