Back

Learned Geometry, Predicted Binding: Structurally-BasedPrediction of Peptide:MHC Binding Using AlphaFold 3 EnablesCD4 T Cell Epitope Prediction

Lahouel, K.; Mulazimuglu, M.; Soria-Bustos, J.; Bates, K.; Kelley, E. J.; Woods, L. J.; Upadhyaya, K. M.; Acevedo, G. R.; Penisson, S.; Munini, M.; Variani, E.; Feeney, M. E.; Altin, J.; Tomasetti, C.

2025-07-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.07.10.664203 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The accurate prediction of T cell epitope peptides within proteins of interest has a wide range of applications, but is complicated by the multiple determinants of antigenicity, the polymorphism of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) locus, and the great diversity of possible peptide antigens. Leading in silico methods use a variety of statistical approaches to learn from sequences identified through both in vitro MHC binding and peptide elution studies, but their performance remains imperfect, particularly for MHC II-restricted responses. Here we present MHCIIFold-GNN, an entirely orthogonal solution to this problem that combines three new elements: (i) a highly-multiplexed peptide:MHCII binding assay, (ii) generalizable structural modeling using AlphaFold3, and (iii) transfer learning with a Graph-based Neural Network. Trained exclusively on newly-generated in vitro binders, we show that MHCIIFold-GNN enables state-of-the-art prediction of CD4 T cell epitopes presented by diverse MHC II proteins, on par with non-structural methods that rely on much larger datasets including naturally-processed ligands. Moreover, when MHCIIFold-GNN and a leading non-structural method are combined, we observe unparalleled performance on a held-out test set (11 % boost), underscoring the orthogonality of the methods. These results highlight the power of a new class of structure-informed approaches to the CD4 T cell epitope prediction problem.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.