Back

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search

Bouwkamp, F. G.; van Haren, J.; de Lange, F.; Spaak, E.

2025-07-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.10.664103 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During visual search, we rely on both selective attention and spatial predictions to guide our behavior. However, whether and how these mechanisms interact is largely unclear. Using a contextual cueing paradigm, we investigated whether learning and exploitation of spatial predictive context can occur outside attentional focus. Repeating search scenes enabled distractor context to serve as a contextual cue predicting target location. Participants searched for a target among distractors in two colors: the same as the target-to-be-searched (attended context) or a different color (ignored context). Halfway through the experiments, we changed the target color, thereby altering the attentional status of distractor contexts while maintaining their spatial predictiveness. In Experiment 1, where participants regularly switched between target colors, we found exploitation of spatial predictive context both within and outside attentional focus. However, in Experiment 2, where attention was more stably focused on one target color, only the attended predictive context was exploited before transfer. Intriguingly, after transfer, previously ignored predictive context showed immediate benefits, revealing latent learning. These findings demonstrate a dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial predictions: while learning occurs independently of attention, exploitation may require attentional selection. Our results suggest that selective attention gates the influence of spatial predictions on behavior, with gating strength determined by the stability of attentional control. Significance statementThis research addresses a fundamental question in cognitive science: can we learn from visual information we are not paying attention to? Our findings reveal a dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction that can explain conflicting findings in the literature. We demonstrate that specifically the ability to exploit predictive spatial context depends critically on attentional stability. When required to flexibly switch attentional sets, we can benefit from both attended and unattended predictive information. However, when attention remains focused, unattended information is learned, but only becomes accessible when it is part of our attentional focus. These results reveal that the filtering operation of selective attention and the utilization of spatial prediction during visual search may actually compete dynamically, with selective attention ultimately constraining predictions influence on behavior. This advances our understanding of how these fundamental cognitive mechanisms interact under competition.

Published in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · published here
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
4
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.9%
8
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
12
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.7%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
17
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
25
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
27
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%