Back

Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Treatment Adherence in Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review

Wasim, A.; Abud, A.; Malick, S.; Nashrah, N. A.; Losanova, V.; Raimugia, H.; Karim, M.; Le, M. V. K.; Baskarathasan, V.; Gibson, C.; Alkhatib, S.; Martins, S. S.

2025-07-11 addiction medicine
10.1101/2025.07.10.25331331 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimOpioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic condition in which an individual engages in the persistent use of opioids that causes significant distress and negatively impacts their societal functioning. Treatment for OUD involves pharmacological therapies such as methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone, typically used in combination with behavioral interventions such as counselling and cognitive behavioural therapy. However, non-adherence to OUD treatment is high, potentially leading to negative outcomes like relapse and increased risk of overdose. Therefore, identifying patients at risk of treatment nonadherence is essential to ensure that OUD is adequately managed. Models utilizing AI and ML techniques have emerged as promising candidates to achieve risk stratification in this patient population. We conducted a scoping review to capture and systematically map existing literature on AI and ML applications predicting adherence to treatment in individuals with OUD. MethodsOvid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched to identify and obtain peer-reviewed empirical research articles published from inception to October 7, 2024. Twenty-two studies were selected to be included in the review. ResultsAll studies that matched our search criteria were published after 2018 and predominantly conducted in the United States. Random forest models were frequently identified as the top performer although significant variability in algorithms, evaluation metrics, and key predictors was noted in the literature. ConclusionThe need for future research to cover more geographical locations, diversify patient populations, focus on a standardized group of models and outcomes, and utilize larger samples was highlighted.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
5
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
7
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%