A Framework for Measuring Population Immunity Against Influenza Using Individual Antibody Titers
Xiong, W.; Huang, X.; Thao, T. T. N.; Thanh, N. T. L.; Peng, L.; Perera, R. A. P. M.; Fang, V. J.; Yang, B.; Wong, S.-S.; Leung, N. H. L.; Sullivan, S. G.; Ip, D. K. M.; Peiris, M.; Ross, T. M.; Boni, M. F.; Cowling, B. J.; Tsang, T. K.
Show abstract
Measuring population immunity is crucial for epidemic control and prevention of infectious diseases. While correlates of protection have been identified at the individual level for some pathogens, methods to translate these into population-level immunity metrics remain underdeveloped. We developed and validated a framework to construct population immunity estimators derived from individual serological measurements. Using influenza as a model system, we analyzed 36,150 serum samples across 4 studies covering 19 epidemics in 2009-2020, establishing four hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) antibody titer-based estimators: geometric mean titer, proportion of non-naive individuals, proportion of population immune, and relative reduction in reproductive number. We found that subtype-specific relative changes of these estimators from previous seasons predicted predominant subtypes in upcoming seasons with up to 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In a longitudinal cohort spanning eight influenza seasons with serum collection during epidemics, we found significant negative correlations between each estimator and subsequent cumulative incidence for H1N1 viruses, but weaker correlations for H3N2 viruses. These relationships remained consistent regardless of the specific protection threshold assigned to different antibody titer levels, provided individual-level protection was at least moderate. Simulation studies revealed that lower effective reproductive numbers and higher antibody waning rates diminished the correlation strength. Our framework provides a systematic approach for evaluating population immunity estimators that could inform preparedness efforts for seasonal epidemics and potentially extend to other infectious diseases.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved resolution of influenza vaccination responses with high-throughput live virus microneutralisation 94%
- The role of viral interference in shaping RSV epidemics following the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic 93%
- A rapid and flexible microneutralization assay for serological assessment of influenza viruses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age-seroprevalence curves for the multi-strain structure of influenza A virus 96%
- Characterizing the epidemiological interactions between influenza and respiratory syncytial viruses and their implications for epidemic control 96%
- Impact of unequal testing on vaccine effectiveness estimates across two study designs: a simulation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adherence and sustainability of interventions informing optimal control against COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- The potential impact of Omicron and future variants of concern on SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics and public health burden: a modelling study 93%
- Characterizing Spatial Epidemiology in a Heterogeneous Transmission Landscape Using a Novel Spatial Transmission Count Statistic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-strain modeling of influenza vaccine effectiveness in older adults and its dependence on antigenic distance 94%
- COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact 93%
- Ecology and environment predict spatially stratified risk of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b in wild birds across Europe 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.