Back

Event-based seizure detection in human iEEG with neuromorphic hardware

Davidhi, F.; Costa, F.; Ledergerber, D.; Indiveri, G.; Imbach, L.; Sarnthein, J.

2025-07-11 neurology
10.1101/2025.07.10.25331024 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEpilepsy is a neurological disorder that affects approximately 1% of the global population. The current method for seizure monitoring, seizure diaries, is often inaccurate, making precise monitoring challenging. A monotonic descending "chirp" pattern in intracranial EEG (iEEG) is a specific marker of seizure onset and can be used for automatic detection. ObjectiveTo determine whether a spiking neural network (SNN) implemented on the DYNAP-SE1 neuromorphic chip can detect chirps/seizures. MethodsWe analysed 48 h of continuous bipolar iEEG from one patient (40 seizures). The signal was filtered into six 10 Hz sub-bands between 0 and 40 Hz, then encoded into UP/DOWN events with software asynchronous delta modulation (ADM). The encoded signal was used as input in the hardware-implemented SNN with 34 adaptive-exponential neurons (3.3 % of the 1024 neurons on one chip). Hierarchical inhibition enforced the required high-to-low band sequence, and a disinhibition unit suppressed isolated low-frequency bursts. We implemented the same 28-neuron SNN (without the dis-inhibition population) on software. ResultsChirps appeared at the onset of all 40 seizures (100 %). The hardware SNN detected every seizure (sensitivity = 100 %) and produced one false alarm in 48 h (falsealarm rate = 0.021 h-1). Mean processing time was 4 h 55 s {+/-} 42 s for each 4-h data block, showing real-time operation. In the software SNN implementation, we analysed the same 48-h iEEG bipolar channel recording, and detected 32/40 seizures (80 % sensitivity) with 9 false alarms (false-alarm rate = 0.19 h-1). ConclusionA 34-neuron SNN implemented on DYNAP-SE1 detects seizures from single-channel iEEG in real time with 100% sensitivity and a low false-alarm rate while using minimal hardware resources.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.