The REgistry of Flow and Perfusion Imaging for Artificial INtelligEnce with PET (REFINE PET): Rationale and Design
Ramirez, G.; Lemley, M.; Shanbhag, A.; Kwiecinski, J.; Miller, R. J.; Kavanagh, P.; Liang, J.; Dey, D.; Slipczuk, L.; Travin, M.; Alexanderson, E.; Carvajal Juarez, I.; Packard, R. R.; Al-Mallah, M.; Einstein, A.; Feher, A.; Acampa, W.; Knight, S.; Le, V.; Mason, S.; Sanghani, R.; Wopperer, S.; Chareonthaitawee, P.; Buechel, R. R.; Rosamond, T. L.; deKemp, R. A.; Berman, D. S.; Di Carli, M. F.; Slomka, P.
Show abstract
RationaleThe REgistry of Flow and Perfusion Imaging for Artificial INtelligEnce with PET (REFINE PET) was established to aggregate PET and associated computed tomography (CT) images with clinical data from hospitals around the world into one comprehensive research resource. MethodsREFINE PET is a multicenter, international registry that contains both clinical and imaging data. The PET scans were processed using QPET software (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA), while the CT scans were processed using deep learning (DL) to detect coronary artery calcium (CAC). Patients were followed up for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which include death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and late revascularization (>90 days from PET). ResultsThe REFINE PET registry currently contains data for 35,588 patients from 14 sites, with additional patient data and sites anticipated. Comprehensive clinical data (including demographics, medical history, and stress test results) were integrated with more than 2200 imaging variables across 42 categories. The registry is poised to address a broad range of clinical questions, supported by correlating invasive angiography (within 6 months of MPI) in 5972 patients and a total of 9252 major adverse cardiovascular events during a median follow-up of 4.2 years. ConclusionThe REFINE PET registry leverages the integration of clinical, multimodality imaging, and novel quantitative and AI tools to advance the role of PET/CT MPI in diagnosis and risk stratification.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Response of the Myocardium to Hypertrophic Conditions in the Adult Population: The Prospective Observational REMODEL Cohort Study Protocol 93%
- Early Structural Cardiovascular Disease, HIV, and Tuberculosis in East Africa (ASANTE): Cross-sectional study protocol for a multimodal cardiac imaging study in Nairobi, Kenya 91%
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 94%
- Reduced stress perfusion in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries 94%
- AngioNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Vessel Segmentation in X-ray Angiography 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 90%
- Cost-effectiveness of CT perfusion for the detection of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke followed by endovascular treatment: A model-based health economic evaluation study 89%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel model to quantify blood transit time in cerebral arteries using ASL-based 4D magnetic resonance angiography with example clinical application in moyamoya disease 89%
- Early stopping in clinical PET studies: how to reduce expense and exposure 88%
- Rethinking animal attrition in preclinical research: expressing causal mechanisms of selection bias using directed acyclic graphs 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.