Statistically valid explainable black-box machine learning: applications in sex classification across species using brain imaging
Liu, T.; Dey, J.; Xu, B.; Alldritt, S. S.; Nenning, K.-H.; Byeon, K.; Xu, T.; Vogelstein, J.
Show abstract
Sex classification using neuroimaging data has the potential to revolutionize personalized diagnostics by revealing subtle structural brain differences that underlie sex-specific disease risks. Despite the promise of machine learning, traditional methods often fall short in providing both high classification accuracy and interpretable, statistically validated feature importance scores for high-dimensional imaging data. This gap is particularly evident when conventional techniques such as random forests, LIME, and SHAP are applied, as they struggle with complex feature interactions and managing noise in large datasets. We address this challenge by developing an integrated framework that combines Oblique Random Forests (ORFs) with a novel, permutation-based feature importance testing algorithm. ORFs extend traditional random forests by employing oblique decision boundaries through linear combinations of features, thereby capturing intricate interactions inherent in neuroimaging data. Our feature importance testing method, NEOFIT, rigorously quantifies the significance of each feature by generating null distributions and corrected p-values. We first validate our approach using simulated datasets, establishing its robustness and scalability under controlled conditions. We then apply our method to classify sex from both voxel-wise structural MRI and cortical thickness data in humans and macaques, facilitating direct cross-species comparisons. ORFs achieves AUC > 0.80 on human data, and > 0.70 on macaque data, while NEOFIT identifies statistically significant features aligned with sex-dimorphic neuroanatomy. Our results demonstrate that the proposed framework not only enhances classification performance but also provides clear, interpretable insights into the neuroanatomical features that distinguish sexes. These methodological advancements pave the way for improved diagnostic tools and contribute to a deeper understanding of the evolutionary basis of sex differences in brain structure.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional analysis and detection of informative features in diffusion MRI measurements of human white matter 95%
- Searching through functional space reveals distributed visual, auditory, and semantic coding in the human brain 95%
- A novel classification framework for genome-wide association study of whole brain MRI images using deep learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feature similarity: a sensitive method to capture the functional interaction of brain regions and networks to support flexible behavior 95%
- On stability of Canonical Correlation Analysis and Partial Least Squares with application to brain-behavior associations 94%
- Deciphering Multiway Multiscale Brain Network Connectivity:Insights from Birth to 6 Months 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.