Altered Decision-Making Across Acute and Chronic Pain States: A Bias Towards Context-Dependent Valuations
Williams, C. C.; Owen, L. L. W.; Gunsilius, C.; Nassar, M. R.; Petzschner, F. H.
Show abstract
Chronic pain is often characterized by the entrenchment of maladaptive behaviors -- avoidance, inactivity, and hypervigilance -- that outlast tissue damage. A central but mechanistically underspecified question is how behaviors acquired during acute pain become locked in as pain chronifies. Influential accounts, including the fear-avoidance model, suggest that behavioral patterns learned in a specific context -- such as avoidance during acute injury -- overgeneralize to situations where they are no longer advantageous. Whether this reflects altered learning or changes in how learned information guides decisions has remained unclear. To address this, we administered a probabilistic reinforcement learning task to 239 individuals with chronic pain, acute pain, or no pain, designed to dissociate two decision strategies: reliance on recent reinforcement history -- what was reinforced in a prior context -- versus global expected value -- the objective worth of an option regardless of context. Learning performance was comparable across all groups, confirming intact associative learning. However, groups differed significantly in decision-making: individuals with chronic pain favored options with stronger context-dependent reinforcement history over those with higher global expected value; however, those without pain showed no preference for one over the other, with the acute pain group showing an intermediate pattern. Computational modeling confirmed this, with chronic pain patients showing significantly reduced weighting toward global expected value. Critically, this shift tracked pain duration rather than intensity -- suggesting prolonged pain exposure gradually biases decisions away from global expected value towards a context-dependent history. These findings offer a computational explanation for behavioral persistence in chronic pain, and this duration-dependent shift, already evident in the acute pain group, may represent an early cognitive signature of chronification.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Endogenous modulation of pain relief: evidence for dopaminergic but not opioidergic involvement 96%
- Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning 95%
- Statistical learning shapes pain perception and prediction independently of external cues 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive feedback, early sensory representations and fast responses to predicted stimuli depend on NMDA receptors 93%
- Dopamine and norepinephrine differentially mediate the exploration-exploitation tradeoff 93%
- Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of the reward 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expectation generation and its effect on subsequent pain and visual perception 95%
- Modeling Decision-Making Under Uncertainty with Qualitative Outcomes 94%
- Removal of reinforcement improves instrumental performance in humans by decreasing a general action bias rather than unmasking learnt associations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expectations and uncertainty shape pain perception during learning 97%
- Real Bodies Not Required? Placebo Analgesia and Pain Perception in Immersive Virtual and Augmented Reality 93%
- Effects of Savoring Meditation on Positive Emotions and Pain-Related Brain Function: A Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.