Back

Differences in brain activity during sentence repetition in people who stutter: a combined analysis of four fMRI studies

Demirel, B.; Chesters, J.; Connally, E.; Gough, P.; Ward, D.; Howell, P.; Watkins, K. E.

2025-07-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.09.663990 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Our understanding of the neural correlates of developmental stuttering benefits from the use of functional MRI (fMRI) during speech production. Despite two decades of research, however, we have reached little consensus. In the current study, we analysed pooled fMRI data from four different studies that used the same sentence reading task and methodological approach. The combined sample included 56 adolescents and adults who stutter and 53 demographically matched typically fluent controls. A sparse-sampling design was used in each study, in which participants spoke during the silent period between measurements of brain activity. Sentence reading evoked activity in both groups across frontal and temporal regions bilaterally. At statistical thresholds corrected for family-wise error, there were no significant group differences. An uncorrected threshold was applied to explore group differences in areas previously identified in earlier fMRI studies on stuttering. People who stutter (PWS) showed greater activity compared with controls in right frontal pole, right anterior insula extending to frontal operculum, left planum temporale, and midbrain, at the level of red nucleus. In contrast, PWS showed lower activity in left superior frontal sulcus, subgenual medial prefrontal cortex, right anterior temporal lobe, and portions of inferior parietal lobe bilaterally including the angular gyrus on the left. Despite pooling data across multiple studies to achieve a relatively large sample, group differences in regions involved in speech-motor control only emerged at an uncorrected voxel-wise threshold. Some of these findings align with previous fMRI studies, such as increased activity in the right anterior insular cortex.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.2%
2
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.8%
4
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
17
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
20
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
23
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%