Back

Sediment chemistry controls methane emissions from lake littoral zones

Tanentzap, A. J.; Woodman, S.; Kolmakova, O.; Zhang, Y.

2025-07-14 ecology
10.1101/2025.07.09.663921 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Methane emissions from the nearshore zones of lakes are relatively large but can vary by several orders of magnitude. Here we compared predictions for how sediment chemistry and microbial communities influenced methane emissions from 19 littoral sites in the UK varying in organic matter sources and microbial composition. Our approach was to compare multiple predictions to explain methane fluxes from sediment chemistry and microbial composition using path analysis. We found that the prediction that organic matter composition, namely the concentration of polyphenolics, controls methane emissions by changing electrochemical conditions to favour certain methanogen taxa was hundreds of times better supported than predictions involving abundances of all methanogens and methanotrophic bacteria, methanogen diversity, or other physicochemical conditions. Diffusive CH4 fluxes were estimated to increase by 3.1- to 16.6-times (95% confidence interval) with increasing polyphenolic concentrations, almost entirely because they lower reduction-oxidation potentials that shift methanogen composition towards widespread taxa positively associated with methanogenesis. Rather than strongly inhibiting methane-producing microorganisms, our results suggest polyphenolics change reduction-oxidation potentials to favour acetoclastic and methylotrophic methanogens. These results help explain conflicting evidence about the responses of methane to sediment chemistry and can improve future predictions of aquatic carbon cycling. Manuscript HighlightsO_LIPolyphenolics predicted nearshore CH4 fluxes better than other environmental factors C_LIO_LICH4 fluxes increased with polyphenolics that lowered redox to favour methanogenesis C_LIO_LIWe help explain conflicting responses of CH4 to variation in sediment chemistry C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.