Temporal Dynamics of Sensorimotor Integration for Non-Visual Target Information During Movement Preparation and Online Control
Camponogara, I.
Show abstract
Endpoint movement variability in non-visual (auditory and proprioceptive) target reaching is modality-dependent. This study investigated whether such modality-specific effects may emerge during movement preparation and how they unfold during movement execution. Participants performed reaching movements toward auditory, proprioceptive, or audio-proprioceptive targets. Electromyography and movement kinematics were recorded to examine the effect of target-related sensory modality on sensory encoding and coordination of motor commands during movement preparation, as well as their effect on movement execution. Results revealed a modality-dependent sensory encoding phase, whereas a modality-independent coordination of motor commands. While the target modality did not affect movement initiation, it modulated the subsequent movement execution. These findings demonstrate that, in non-visual target reaching, the effect of target-related sensory modality extends beyond execution to specific phases of movement preparation. Our results support a four-stage model of action control toward non-visual targets, consisting of a modality-dependent sensory encoding phase of movement preparation and early execution, as well as a modality-independent motor coordination and movement initia-tion. These findings provide new insights into the temporal dynamics of sensorimotor control without vision, suggesting a different use of non-visual (proprioceptive and auditory) target-related sensory information during distinct phases of movement preparation and execution. HighlightsO_LIAuditory and proprioceptive target reaching shows modality-specific endpoint variability. C_LIO_LIThis study investigates whether such modulation occurs within the movement preparation stage. C_LIO_LIModality-specific sensory modulation has been found in specific phases of movement preparation. C_LIO_LIModality-specific effects emerge during early and late movement execution. C_LIO_LIFindings support a four-stage model of non-visual action control, separating encoding, coordination, initiation, and execution. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect 96%
- Different time scales of common-cause evidence shape multisensory integration, recalibration and motor adaptation 96%
- No evidence for somatosensory attenuationduring action observation of self-touch 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.